14

Note- this applies to state workers, and not everyone....

But still....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

I know this has been said elsewhere, but I also find that this continues not caring about the environment too. The amount of saved gas, wear and tear on vehicles, traffic and more was huge. Like in the height of the WFH we saw CO2 reductions that we can't dream of doing normally, except we proved that we could if we just let people who can and want to WFH and not be burning all those resources.

And the idea that eating out is going to go back to 2019 levels just by making people come in to work ignores the massive inflation, so unless they're also paying a large percentage more to finance this, even people who want to eat out might not be able to afford to. I'm talking like a 50% increase going to a McDonalds.

I also hate the "It's not fair" argument - yea, what and when in capitalism has "it been fair" between different jobs?

Finally, the supposed productivity for being on site is going to vary greatly depending on the situation. This idea that no one ever disappeared for an hour or wasted time when people were in an office shows a complete disconnect from reality. I get more "useful" stuff done WFH because instead of only being able to watch Youtube when the office is slow, I can go do a load of dishes or make some calls I need to make.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
49 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS