357
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Ever notice that plastic taste in bottled water? There's a reason it tastes like plastic.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh well. Gonna have to die some way.

I guess we all just prefer living in older times where you’re lucky if you live to 40.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Most people lived longer into their life if they survived past childhood. Their quality of life wasn't as potentially as good in that age, obviously.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right and the lack of medical intervention meant that most people didn’t make it past 40.

You can’t argue the fact that average life expectancy has increased significantly thanks to technology and advancement in medical science.

Back then people would die from a simple tooth infection. That’s extraordinary rare now a days.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right and the lack of medical intervention meant that most people didn’t make it past 40.

People often lived well into their old age if they survived past their childhood. For instance, the average life expectancy during the Victorian era was about 73-75. (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k037).

The average pre-industrial lifespan was around 40 but is skewed due to incredibly high child mortality rates. Wherein roughly a third didn't survive their first year and almost half didn't survive their second year (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812001237#s0015).

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re cherry picking. Go back farther in time. The farther back you look the higher the mortality rates.

The point is on average life expectancy has increased. It scales with technology.

The fact that you’re even arguing this is ridiculous.

Do you know WHY so many people died giving birth? Do you know why so many people died in childhood? Medical technology. It’s not a mystery dude. https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/excavations-reveal-daily-life-of-10000-years-ago-30504#

Most of the skeletons found in graves at Aşıklıhöyük belong to women and children, Özbaşaran said. “It is interesting that there was a high number of deaths among children and women. Probably many deaths occurred during birth. Epidemic diseases were also prevalent. We determined that the average age of death was between 25 and 30 in Aşıklıhöyük, which is very young. A man who died between the ages of 45 and 50 had one of the longest lives.”

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re cherry picking. Go back farther in time. The farther back you look the higher the mortality rates.

I... I've literally provided you with cited sources that also have further sources. Would you like me to gather all available studies on this subject for you?

The fact that you’re even arguing this is ridiculous

I'm not arguing anything. I'm trying to present you with new, relevant information concerning your initial statement since it's a widely spread bit of pop science that's been ~~corrected~~ updated.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re trying to convince me that life expectancy hasn’t changed at all in the last 20,000 years. As if our medical break throughs have zero impact.

Are you high?

Stop.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Again, not trying to convince you of anything. The cited sources are thorough and well articulated. I encourage you to give them a read if you'd like to become better acquainted with more contemporary findings on the lifespans of our ancestors.

Take care.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Pepsi@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

“Im not just gonna READ some STUDY when I know SCIENCE, idiot!”

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine thinking studies are always accurate and don’t have flaws. It’s ONE study little guy.

Try working on your critical thinking skills since you suck at it.

Wow you sure got me there bud. ROFL.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

There you go. A study that says the complete opposite to your silly narrative with several data points and verified sources.

What do you have to say now? Can’t wait!!

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
357 points (100.0% liked)

News

23284 readers
3430 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS