761
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] David_Eight@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago

Why is sex work even illegal in the first place.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago

Selling is legal, fucking is legal, why isn't selling fucking legal?

-- George Carlin

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago

Seas he also the fella that said “Getting paid for sex is illegal… UNLESS YOU RECORD IT!”

[-] vrek@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago

For years I've contemplated the idea if I came into a bunch of money if starting a porn studio where the customer is an actor/actress in the porn.

We have a building and several "sets" with cameras recording, customer picks their "partner" and "set" and "shoot the porn", after they are done the video is burned on to a dvd(or blue ray or potentially put on a private file server).

The customer isn't paying for sex, they are paying for the video.

Pretty sure it would have a ton of legal push back and I would need a lot of money for the lawyers to fight the cases.

But 1. Safer for everyone imvolved(it's video taped so you won't beat/hurt/kill the other party) 2.technically legal just like shooting porn

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is actually a great idea for couples! The issue of course would be to make sure that the couples are actual couples.

You could have them sign a release indicating that it's a "photo studio", and you can have different prices: one for commercial use ($5,000 per hour) and one for private use ($100 an hour, and you're not allowed to commercially distribute the DVD.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 60 points 1 year ago

The underlying assumption is the same as in abortion: that women can't be entrusted with agency over their own bodies.

[-] Hillock@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago

Because one of the biggest issues with sex work, human trafficking, gets worse with legalization. Studies across Europe have shown that countries that outlaw prostitution see a decrease in human trafficking victims while countries that legalized or decriminalized it see an increase.

Unlike with drugs, you don't just create a way to increase the supply. A very small minority of women actually want to engage in sex work. And the few who do, usually envision the high class escort lifestyle. But working in a brothel charging $100 per client isn't something many want to do.

But legalizing prostitution increases demand. Which makes it more profitable for criminals to utilize human trafficking to fill that demand.

https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/lids/2014/06/12/does-legalized-prostitution-increase-human-trafficking/

One source of it.

It also doesn't help at all with protecting victims of human trafficking. Victims of human trafficking are already protected. But they don't step forward because of threats against their own well being and that of their families. Something that doesn't change just because their work technically is legal now.

Which leaves a small percentage of people who fall into financial hardship and consider prostitution as a method of overcoming said hardship. For them that might slightly improve their situation. But that still means exploiting vulnerable people and isn't people engaging in sex work because they want to. And it's even questionable if people in these scenarios would follow the legal way.

So while initially it might seem like legalizing it solves a lot of issues, it is more difficult than that.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Us laws regarding sex work are firmly based in puritanical values not out of any concern whatsoever regarding trafficking.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the data. I think the issue here is not that legal prostitution creates problems, but rather the government bodies being incompetent at protecting the victims, then.

There are other industries in which people "sell their bodies" for profit (the military and construction come to mind), and if those can be quite regulated, why can't prostitution?

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

We all sell our bodies for profit. To be fair though, wage theft is the most common form of theft. We're all prostitutes and we're almost all being taken advantage of, and we're in a system where we can't really get out.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 4 points 1 year ago

government bodies being incompetent at protecting the victims, then.

My guess is that it's just more difficult to control prostitution than it is to control construction work. Construction happens in the open, you need to get tons of permits, multiple companies are involved, inspectors check everything regularly. It would be difficult to force some people to work on a construction site without anyone realizing. But how are you going to make sure that each sexual intercourse in some strip bar is 'legal'? Are you going to put inspectors in bathroom stalls? How can you check every cash transaction? It's pretty much impossible. You can monitor the sex work that's advertised and happening 'in the open' but there will always be some grey and black market for it. And the ugly stuff will happen there.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Because one of the biggest issues with sex work, human trafficking, gets worse with legalization.

Yes, because legalizing sex work is just criminalizing sex work with extra steps. It's very easy to see an (alleged) "rise in sex trafficking" when the legalization shuffle allows politicians to all of a sudden decide what is "allowed" sex work and what is "sex trafficking."

This is why shitty studies like the one you linked is so thoroughly non-credible - it was performed without the input of the people who actually know what they are talking about - ie, sex workers themselves.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

What the fuck are you talking about?

legalizing sex work is just criminalizing sex work with extra steps

So what's the solution?? You just made random assertions without any sources and didn't suggest any alternatives. All while skimming over the very real trafficking/coersion problems unique to sex work.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I was totally onboard with them but the longer they talk the weirder the takes get.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What the fuck are you talking about?

Do tell... is this the first time you've actually considered what sex workers themselves have to say about (so-called) "legalization?"

None of this is a secret, Clyde.

unique to sex work.

ROFLMAO! No, genius... trafficking is not unique to sex work in any way, shape, or form. If you weren't filled to the brim with anti-sex work hysteria you'd have known that already.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Do tell… is this the first time you’ve actually considered what sex workers themselves have to say about (so-called) “legalization?”

The sex workers with those opinions usually are the already more well off workers who perform escort or cam services, and isn't reflective of the bottom strata of sex worker experiences. It also doesn't address how more common sex work leads to higher trafficking rates.

trafficking is not unique to sex work in any way, shape, or form.

Lol I'd love any source on this whatsoever. I'm not sure how you defend this line of thought, or why you feel this way. You don't think human trafficking shares any of the same risk factors or conditions as sex work?

ROFLMAO!

LOLCOPTER

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

and isn’t reflective of the bottom strata of sex worker experiences.

You're going to have to do a whole lot better than hiding behind impoverished people.

It also doesn’t address how more common sex work leads to higher trafficking rates.

That has already been explained to you.

Lol I’d love any source on this whatsoever.

You need a source to tell you that labor and refugee trafficking is a thing?

I’m not sure how you defend this line of thought,

It's really simple... I have no wish to demonize and criminalize sex workers - unlike you.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I see this single study trotted out every time the subject comes up and the key factor to take into account is that this is reported trafficking. If legalized sex work means more light is shed on human trafficking that means more can be done about it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] stella@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Puritan values.

[-] momtheregoesthatman@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Old white men elected themselves under the guise of voting (gerrymandering who?) and are too embarrassed and confused to allow women the rights they have as humans. Isn't democracy silly.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 23 points 1 year ago

My bet is on America's conservative puritan history where anything good is bad.

Also sex trafficking. At least that's the argument for keeping it illegal. :(

[-] Plague_Doctor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I believe the reason sex trafficking happens is because sex work is illegal.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Which is bollocks anyways because illegalization actually makes things less safe for all sex workers, but especially for trafficking victims who are now legally marginalized into dark number status

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I'd say the diagram of "Why is sex work illegal" and "Why is abortion illegal" is almost a perfect circle.

It's about contolling other peoples' bodies and weakening the separation of church and state.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Sex work differs from most other type of work in one very significant way - it's an industry in which capitalists cannot really control the means of production unless slavery (ie, a person can become the private property of another) is legalized and institutionalized. In other words, a sex worker - for the most part - is not as easily coerced into selling their labor to capitalists like most workers can be, and capitalists hate when people have a way to opt out of being hosts for their parasitism.

Sex work also has a way of subverting patriarchal norms upon which the status quo rests.

This is not to say that sex work is automatically a revolutionary, anti-capitalist or even "empowering" thing by itself - there are plenty of ways in which our socio-economic systems allows and enables de facto slavery without calling it slavery - but it certainly doesn't fit into the neat class hierarchy that capitalists wants society to be trapped within.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sex work also has a way of subverting patriarchal norms upon which the status quo rests.

cough, what? No, it reinforces those norms. Men in power get to have women at their beck and call.

This isn't a capitalist thing. Just look at how profitable the sex industry is in Nevada.

It's a "holier than thou" thing that we just haven't been able to get rid of in our society.

As much as I like calling out greed for what it is, this simply isn't one of those cases.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

cough, what?

You read correctly the first time. It's a lot more difficult to entrap sex workers in patriarchal hierarchies than a housewife (for instance)... this should not be too difficult to understand.

This isn’t a capitalist thing.

All sex work in the world today exists under a capitalist mode of production - as far as I can tell, there is (officially, at least) no such thing as "publicly-funded" sex work... and that is unfortunate.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

as far as I can tell, there is (officially, at least) no such thing as "publicly-funded" sex work... and that is unfortunate.

You lost me.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Wait till you learn that you can be self employed outside of sex work.

For the most parts its just christian morality still ingrained in our society.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Wait till you learn that you can be self employed outside of sex work.

Yes, the homeless people trying to sell me trinkets at the intersection certainly seems to prove your point.

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

The only self employed people you can think of are homeless dudes selling trinkets and prostitutes?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

AFAIK, it's not federally illegal, but mostly every state bans it. As how Nevada can have prostitution.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
761 points (100.0% liked)

News

23361 readers
2979 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS