337
submitted 1 year ago by abobla@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You're getting down voted but as someone who had exactly 3 shirts and 2 pair of shorts in high school, I would have vastly preferred a uniform mandate. My mom had enough money she just didn't see extra clothes as a necessary expense for her. She would have been forced to get the uniforms and I would have had an easier time in high school.

People are also saying that's an unnecessary expense for the poor people, but why can the school afford the building, the teachers, administration, etc, but not 5 pairs of clothes for the students? Maybe even for need based students?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

why can the school afford the building, the teachers, administration, etc, but not 5 pairs of clothes for the students

Even in public schools, parents have to pay for the gym uniform. Books too.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have not paid a cent for either and my kids attend public

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
337 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12375 readers
249 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS