848
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago

That isn't always the case though. Just look at climate scientists.

Some just want to ban smoking because they see how much damage it has done in their community.

But I'd also like to know if there was any vested interests.

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 36 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure what this has to do with climate scientists. What am I supposed to be looking at?

Rishi has a history of making legislation to benefit the companies run or owned by friends and family. I would be extremely surprised if this didn't also have a similar angle.

[-] ours@lemmy.film 6 points 2 years ago

Just some good old "whataboutism". Maybe he sprinkles some climate-change denial into some prohibition discussion to distract us?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Climate activists want to, among other things, pass extremely unpopular carbon taxes as they're the most serious effort toward cutting fossil fuels usage

Extremely unpopular ideas that inevitably favor certain products are not always moves to sell those products, is the point

It's pretty reasonable to assume no one outside the UK knows much about Sunak's history with handouts to friends.

[-] Risk@feddit.uk 16 points 2 years ago

Who are carbon taxes unpopular with? Aside from politicians?

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The people that have to pay them, I assume

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

People who don't understand we need to break our addiction to petroleum based fuel. Also People who make money off of petroleum based products.

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I think you overestimate the size of these two groups. The group of people who care more about their own financials is likely a lot larger.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago

Don't care thier fucking size.

I care how loud these choads are and how many they might sway.

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Because the number of people voting for something is irrelevant? Yeah, makes sense.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago
[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Then you're missing the point to begin with.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

And you don't have a good one.

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe try practising your reading comprehension a bit more, then I'm sure you'll understand it eventually.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Good luck eating and drinking money.

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I never said that I agreed with them.

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

That's a matter of proper implementation. Tax & dividend! Distribute the tax revenue to the population per capita.

That means:

  • If your emissions are average, you pay/earn net zero.
  • If you emit more than average, you pay. This will affect mostly rich people, since emissions strongly correlate with available money.
  • If you emit less than average, you net earn. This effectively rewards people with money gained for emissions prevented.

Since money is distributed unequally in society, this means most people will have to pay less in such a system.

The beautiful thing is, the financial incentive to emit less remains even for people who gain more than they pay. It's also an incentive both for buyers and sellers, researchers and investors.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

It’s Rishi Sunak. Of course he has a financial interest somewhere.

It won’t work, though. Hell. He might be getting paid off by big Tabacco- make smoking edgy and rebellious again so more kids start up.

It’s the kind of thing those ghouls would try.

[-] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Rishi Sunak also just promised to ensure cars will be able to drive through heavily populated areas indefinitely and has pushed back plans to introduce electric-only cars. He absolutely does not care about peoples' health.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
848 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46615 readers
1977 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS