1709

What an utter piece of shit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Stop trying to tell a private citizen and businessman what he can and can’t do with his own business

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 65 points 1 year ago

He got to where he is with government funding.

Turn off the tap. Now.

[-] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

First of all he got there by being the best businessman in the world, lots a hard work and plucky stick-to-it-ive-ness plus a keen eye for innovation. Think about this. If he hadn’t used his space satellites to stop the Ukies, Putin could have launched the Nukies! Basically he saved the planet and this is the thanks you give him. No good deed goes unpunished

[-] hupito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 year ago

This parody tankie account is too close to the real thing to work. Leave some room for satire, broskie.

[-] Soulg@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Best business man in the world. Buys an unprofitable company for 40b, then runs it directly into the ground. Genius.

[-] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It’s part of a bigger strategy that you wouldn’t understand

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago
[-] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

His brain is too big and powerful for lazy poors to keep up with his plans. He works in mysterious ways.

[-] Rawdogg@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Strategically losing billions, bold plan cotton

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The troll account is annoying when you're crowding out other discussion.

[-] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I’m the only one bringing common sense to these discussions at all

[-] Rawdogg@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

He got where he is off the back of slavery in an emerald mine his father runs you twat

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago

When you have a contract with the federal government it comes with stipulations. Don't "private citizen" this. It's not a mom and pop store.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But Starlink DIDN'T have a contract with the US government, DOD, or Ukraine government. That's the point. And they went ahead and used it for guided munitions.

Which is a violation of the terms of service and not what anyone at SpaceX had intended.

Problem is, that's exactly how they ended up being used!

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You're tracking that Starlink sells service directly to the US military for activities that aren't exactly tickle parties right?

[-] yaaaaayPancakes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

True, but didn't Starshield happen after this stuff? I guess I need to relook at the timeline. But as I remember things, he started tossing starlink access at Ukraine, tried to get DoD to pay, they chose not to. Then he started to these games, and after that DoD started paying up. Starshield was announced a little bit after that.

[-] sirjash@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

Where do you draw the line? Should he also be allowed to sell his services to Russia? Should private companies from the US be allowed to sell arms to Russia?

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

Never mind that. Let’s suppose he can sell his services to whomever he likes.

What about the privacy implications? How did he know that specific attack was planned? Can he just listen in on any communication going across Starlink? I don’t think anyone should be okay with that.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Since he runs Starlink, he has a map of where every single Starlink receiver is located. Literally, a real time map with GPS coordinates.

Russia would kill to have that info.

However, musk also hack and jam proofed Starlink to help Ukraine too.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

How did he know that specific attack was planned?

Ukraine asked him to extend Starlink coverage for the attack.

No conspiracy theory needed, they just told him.

[-] Wilibus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure where the line is but expecting a private citizen to provide vital defense infrastructure to your foreign allies and continually act in your best interests is clearly past it.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The issue is removing infrastructure on your own personal whims when it goes against what your own tax payers are paying for, especially when they have funded your company / companies. It's obscene.

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Except it wasn't "removed", he declined to "extend" it before getting paid by those tax payers.

[-] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Of course. That’s called capitalism and the free market. Don’t like it? Move to Venezuela

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Nah, I'd rather attack the cancer that is capitalism at the source and work to rid the world of its scourge once and for all. Sorry you chose the loser's side.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There's currently sanctions on buying or selling a lot of things from Russia aren't there?

[-] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The whole reason this happened is because he disabled Starlink satellites over Russia in order to help the Ukrainian war effort. He just refused to turn it on for a specific offensive operation in Crimea that Ukraine requested - claiming he wanted to avoid escalation. Him and the US government were in agreement during time. Remember the US did not want to give tanks and planes because of fear of escalation.

I don't mean to try and put a damper on the 5 minute hate session but I wish people would make an effort to try and understand what is happening before they make all sorts of wild conclusions and statements.

[-] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Why? I think capitalism’s a toxic system and he has no moral right to his wealth.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

"Citizen" is the critical word here

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Ukraine" telling a "US citizen" what to do, are the critical words here.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Hes a US Citizen undermining the US Government

[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Is he? Did the US Government issue an order to attack Russian assets? Even Russian assets on Ukrainian soil? Even to support any Ukrainian effort to attack Russian assets?

So far it's been a "we give Ukraine some stuff and intel, and let them do the fighting while keeping a semblance of plausible deniability".

Sounds more like a direct involvement in the attack, would've been undermining the US Government.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
1709 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1502 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS