553
submitted 1 year ago by shadysus@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Great news then. Banning landlords of non purpose built units, would drop prices!

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Like former office space or whatever? That's not what OP said, but encouraging repurposing is an idea worth talking about.

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

No, as in single family homes. If the building was expressly built with density in mind (think triplex and above) then it's fine IMO. This reduces the land scarcity side of the equation, as well as incentivizes density.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
553 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
260 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS