379
Team Car! (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

My issue is if you want to bike in the streetlike a car, then you have to obey car rules. Like stopping at stop lights and stop signs. If you want to ride on the sidewalk then you have to obey pedestrian rules, like crossing at the correct times. Thr number of cyclists I've seen blow through stop signs and stop lights is staggering.

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

When cycling like a pedestrian here, such as on a shared bike/footpath, you do follow pedestrian rules at crossings. So lights are only advisory and you may cross at any time if you want to.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago

to be fair, it's not like fewer cyclists are following the rules than drivers

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You say that, but drivers would lose their minds bicyclists followed the same rules. Example: Taking the whole lane.

[-] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

I wish bikes just took the whole lane like a car. Half assing it either way is really the problem.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't disagree, but the reason we don't is because of the intense road rage it causes in drivers.

[-] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

It's called vehicular cycling and it's a safer way to cycle.

[-] glibg10b@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Also often called "taking the primary position". It's often done to prevent close passes by forcing drivers who want to overtake to wait for a gap in the next lane

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

That or if you are in a group you cycle next to each other, so you are together taking up a comparable width of a car.

That is the one which angers carbrains the most. Yet it is the safer way to ride.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I first found John Forester's book in the library in the 90s, and it felt like a tome of secret, special knowledge. Then, I read more of it, and it did not match my experiences.

Jason Slaughter has now done a very extensive takedown video on his Not Just Bikes channel, which is far more congruent with what I have seen. Taking the lane is effective when there's no other choice, when it's too narrow for cars to pass, but drivers will try anyway.

Otherwise, there's very little that's safe about it.

[-] mbp@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago

Thanks for shouting it out! I've been putting off watching that video for weeks but I'll give it a go based on the recommendation here.

[-] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Man, it's almost as if we need a third thing. A sort of, road for bicycles (or long, skinny concentration camp, if you prefer) which is suited to bicycling without getting in the way. Get those bloody cyclists off our roads and footpaths, those are for us!

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

How would you implement this? Are they going to have bridges over every traffic light?

[-] Alienz8mypopcorn@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I live in a city in the US that has "bike lights" at the intersections. These give bicyclists the right of way without "letting" cars go as well.

Little longer of a traffic light, but makes biking waaaaay more approachable for newbie bicyclists (like me!)

Unfortunately, this is the only place I've ever seen them implemented.

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Seen some in the UK, usually its timed so that it gives bikes a head start instead of only bikes go.

[-] phar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Toronto has a pretty sweet setup with bike lanes that have their own bike street lamps. Seems to work very well for a city of millions.

[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

The Netherlands would like a word.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Granted. But they were originally built with cyclists in mind. I would love their infrastructure!

[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

But they were originally built with cyclists in mind

No it wasn't

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 13 points 1 day ago

The Netherlands was as car-brained as most other countries. Then, they changed course after the Stop de Kindermoord (Stop Murdering Children) protests, and started to build for people outside of cars. The process of rebuilding is still underway, now, in 2026.

The difference is not that the Netherlands was originally built for bicycles. It was not. The difference is that Americans don't give two shits about the lives of children.

[-] PyroNeurosis 3 points 1 day ago

Extensive unlit tunnels five feet tall and two and a half feet wide. Entry and exit is by vertical shaft only.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

I'm so down for this!

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Dutch people: "both of those are dumb and dangerous"

[-] robin 6 points 1 day ago

Some places you don’t have to. Here, a stop sign is a yield for bikes, and a red light is a stop sign, legally. It works really well imo.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
379 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41476 readers
3719 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS