284
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 66 points 1 day ago

WHAT ABOUT RAND()? CHECKMATE AI HATERS!!! (/s)

[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 27 points 1 day ago

Randomness can still be deterministic and useful. Monte Carlo simulations and whatnot

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago

That's the funny bit - unlike rand() which is purelly random with a uniform distribution - a feature which as you point out is useful - and is reliably so, copilot at best has a wild-ass distribution with an the extremelly high dimensionality of its shape which is not even reliable because every time it's initialization parameters are tweaked or any model weights change, the shape of that distribution changes.

It's like they were trying to come up with the thing that's the closest possible to mathematically useless.

[-] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

But what if that is what casinos use to be random?

[-] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

I read that some have cameras pointed at a wall of lava lamps, they combine random pixel data, with timestamps to the nanosecond, to generate random data.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
284 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7957 readers
1292 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS