950
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone 92 points 1 month ago

letting your agent run commands without reviewing them first is peak stupid

[-] uuj8za@piefed.social 77 points 1 month ago

Creating an environment that incentivizes not thinking is peak stupid.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 1 month ago

Having production credentials in a dev environment is more stupider but they'll never learn because they outsourced their thinking.

The thing is Claude would have told them that too, it probably did tbh and they just clicked right through the warning

[-] uuj8za@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

aarg. claude not happy.

arg. warn. go away.

ah, claude happy now.

Dev cycles now.

[-] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

Everyone has a development environment, but not everyone has a separate production environment.

This is almost certainly the case of dev happening in the live environment.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Everyone has a development environment, but not everyone has a separate production environment.

I think you meant to flip that. The only time one has a dev with no prod is prior to first release.

If environment is the live one, that's production not dev. Using it for development doesn't make it a dev environment. It means you only have prod.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

It's a sarcasm about corporate spending decisions. The joke is:

Everyone has a test environment. Some are lucky enough to also have a production environment.

The point being that if management has decided not to spend resources on a test environment, then "production" is in fact test.

[-] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 month ago

Claude code even added an auto mode so that you don't get blocked by that pesky reviewing anymore. Since then, the usual mode of asking before running a command, for instance when the thing wants to read the entire codebase looking for information only available in an online doc, is now called manual mode; the non 10x developer mode.

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Cursor just added this too. Some auto mode which is "safe" because of some sandbox bs.

Took me 10 mins to find how to turn it off. And they keep trying to sneak it on again.

At least twice a week I have to cancel it when it asks to run something which will fuck things up.

[-] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

What's the point of AI if you need qualified review?

[-] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Normally, speed. Especially if you aren't a picky writer; which you should be; for scenarios like this one.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

It’s still so much faster. An experienced engineer spoon-feeding the AI the exact logic/algorithm to use is still faster than writing it by hand. I think a lot of people stopped early when AI was worse and/or before they started being good at using it.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, faster spaghetti. Wonderful.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

If you’re getting spaghetti it’s a skill issue.

If you vibe code, sure you’ll get slop. Ask it to do something to get X result, you’re leaving it room to think so you get slop. Tell it exactly what logic you want it to use, step by step like it’s a child, then you get the same you’d do yourself but faster.

Look at the PRs for quality-critical projects like the linux kernel and I guarantee you coudn’t tell which PR has some AI and which does not.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
950 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32824 readers
786 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS