517
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SnotFlickerman 108 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Isn't this enough proof that these chucklefucks are a drain on company resources and time and the FIRST thing to replace AI with is the bosses so workers can organize collectively while the AI helps them stay organized without the AI being in control.

I mean, I guess that would make too much sense.

Genuinely though, if the first thing they do with AI is outsource their own decision making, isn't it just rock solid evidence that these people are useless at their fucking jobs to begin with? They aren't even making the decisions anymore, the AI is. Let's cut out the middleman, which is all a boss is now if AI is running the show. I mean, it's what they did with all the junior developers, because they had forced the juniors into using AI and then asked themselves "why not cut out the middleman." And they hadn't even considered that maybe the cost of AI would outpace the cost of an employee. How the fuck are these short term thinking idiots in fucking charge anyway? A lot of bosses are just fucking charlatans.

EDIT: Clarified first sentence.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 67 points 3 weeks ago

They're also probably the only employees who can be replaced by AI at a cost savings because of their hugely inflated compensation.

[-] bagsy@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

HR is there to manage benefits mostly. if the US went to medicare for all, and done away with employer sponsored health care, then a ton of HR could go away. Company culture might actually improve for once.

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 18 points 3 weeks ago

My partner works in HR, and from what I've heard about her stories from her job, this is nowhere near true. Anecdotal evidence, though.

There is a lot of paperwork that needs to be done. If everyone could follow simple, written and documented directions that have actual pictures about how to fill the form you have to fill, you could have a lot less HR people.

But majority of employees are not able to. They have to remind them dozens of times and chase people who didn't do it unless personally threatened. They have to constantly answer questions that are very well documented. They have to parse out information that finances should be able to access, but they need it directly copied from the systems.

It sounds like hell of a job, that would've been so much easier if people were able to follow simple instructions. And the kind of people that can't follow a step-by-step guide that had 5 notifications about needing to be done in a Slack channel won't do it if some AI is telling them to.

From what I've heard, she is just managing disasters that could be a legal problem, always chasing people who don't care about their annoying beraucracy that could cause a lot of trouble.

I have a lot more respect for HR after seeing it from the other side.

[-] bagsy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Fair enough. I suppose I'm showing my bias. The only time I ever deal with HR is for open enrollment.

[-] SnotFlickerman 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

True, but I still think there would be plenty for HR to be mediating in terms of employee-to-employee relationships. However, it's a big ask for HR to stop being a "cover your ass" department that is otherwise dedicated to making sure things like sexual harassment and hostile workplace environments don't impact the company itself despite existing in the company all the same. Because that too is a large function of HR.

[-] louloukoutsis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago

It’s okay, they will need all the devs they can get when they realise how much AI has messed up their codebases lol

[-] SnotFlickerman 6 points 3 weeks ago

Like how Ford just had to hire back all their old greybeard engineers after the AI was not actually up to snuff (shocker).

[-] darth_grunkus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Not all. Just a select few. To help the AI.

[-] juanito_the_great@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Indeed, but lets see how this story develops. I've done my share of messing up repos with genAI, plus have some background in ML... these gives me the intuition that hiring back seniors to "fix the AI" is not going to cut it.

[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

If I were them, I'd just not teach the AI very well.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. The managers are the most replaceable.

They're too dumb to realize this, though... And they're in charge...

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well capitalism is darwinistic. They'll probably disappear.

[-] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 3 weeks ago

Darwinism involves a lot of cruelty and suffering via starvation and predation.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Yes it does.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
517 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86515 readers
2867 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS