9
submitted 16 hours ago by AccoSpoot1@lemmy.world to c/rpg@ttrpg.network

Hi y'all, my players have voiced concerns about the amount of time between combat rounds, I was wondering if anyone else has experienced similar problems and how they gave players more agency in combat when it's not their turn.

Thanks in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AccoSpoot1@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

DnD 3.5 Ravenloft, so kinda locked in yeah.

[-] pteryx@dice.camp 2 points 15 hours ago

When it comes to 3.5, the biggest potential slowdown lies in trying to keep status conditions straight, especially 1) stacked buffs and 2) those with durations measured in rounds at low levels. What sort of arrangements does your table have to track status conditions?

Note also that actually paying attention to the battle instead of treating it as background noise when it's not your turn helps. There's a big table speed difference between having a plan and asking for a summary.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

There goes my suggestion then!

I tend to run shorter campaigns of about 20 sessions or so. We change games all the time, but it definitely isn't for everyone.

I will say that the combat is a big reason that I don't run D&D; not that it's bad but my brain just doesn't work well with it, and I prefer a more improvisational kind of style.

I hope you find something that works for you; good on you for finding a way to value your players' time.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

rpg

4855 readers
18 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS