2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Swimming_Monitor@sh.itjust.works to c/controversial@sh.itjust.works

Please keep it civil.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

No need to call anybody a quack. I'm just trying to understand your controversial opinion.

Social categorization is incredibly vague, so it's still not clear to me what you feel should be abolished.

[-] Shit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I think he is trying to say everyone should become a they/them and he wants to abolish he/she genders?

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Responding here since I didn't know how to ping you in the other comment, in a sort of blunt way, you're correct. Everyone would simply just be, not categorized into gender and the associated social expectations that come with it

I'd be surprised if his most controversial opinion is related to grammar.

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

In an extremely blunt way, it's correct. It obviously extends beyond grammar, and I have an entirely different stance on how 3rd person pronouns should be handled in English that described, but the premise is solid. Take where you would typically use gender, and, like, don't. Obviously you would still have biological sex for things like medical records, but it wouldn't be tied to who you are as a person, it would just be a letter on a paper somewhere.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics

430 readers
1 users here now

Controversial - the community to discuss controversial topics.

Challenge others opinions and be challenged on your own.

This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, "trust me bro" is not a valid argument.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS