685
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] its_kim_love 272 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] charokol@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran

[-] Ariselas@piefed.ca 66 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 30 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] cybernihongo@reddthat.com 29 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] UnimportantHuman@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] slemptastrophe@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

The US is not winning the war in Iran.

[-] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 26 points 2 months ago
[-] brem@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Commenting on this comment is TREASON!

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Dang and I was hoping for a grand slam

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] suigenerix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

TREASON!

Great. I've got my Costco pitchfork.

Erm... shouldn't we be rioting or something. Frankly, I'm a bit of a virgin at all this.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 25 points 2 months ago

What even are the conditions for victory?

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Death to all brown people... Oh you mean in war? No body knows.

[-] Flower@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The goal of the war? Establishing Greater Israel. Netanyahu is really keen on the neighbor's land. Trump is just there as the muscle, barely know what's going on and just acts tough to protect his reputation with his flunkies.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Permanent distraction from the fact that Trump trafficked and raped dozens of young girls with Jeffrey Epstein. That's the entire goal.

Israel forced Trump into this war because they have that proof of him raping children hanging over his head. Israel is just your standard genocidal imperialistic religious fanatical fascist regime that views any Muslims as "animals" or "subhumans" (their own words).

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Disruption of their nuclear weapons program

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

If that was the case we would have kept the Obama deal

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah but that was a brown person’s deal and we can’t have that.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Maybe the reason he canceled that deal was so that he had an excuse to manufacture pretense later.

I don't think he has that much foresight, but maybe the people pulling his strings do...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Multiple problems with that deal as well, sadly enough

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Ya because that's how deals work... The fact that one took years and thousands of experts from all over the world to broker is testimony to how dumb this notion that Iran doesn't have the right get something back in negotiations is laughable. Also inserting that they don't have the right to self determination via self defense is also insulting to everyone involved.

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

It's insulting not to want a bunch of murdering religious nutjobs to have nukes?

Maybe they should free their people before I'll entertain the thought that they have 'the right' to such horrible weapons

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

So, who should have nukes? Just America and their allies? Every country has seen that as soon as they lose nuclear capability they crumble from imperialism, so why would they give up their weapons?

Ideally Iran or NK or Russia (or America) wouldn't have nuclear weapons, but that's not reality.

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Every increase makes it worse, especially when it's murderous religious dictatorships

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Every increase? We are a murderous religious dictatorship. Once again other dictatorships have nukes. Other nations have nukes. Only one has ever used them to kill. We are not the good guys here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Also wanted to add the Obama deal prevented them from getting nukes. You know how I know that? I read the fucking reports from the international inspectors. Iran passed every search and were complying with the deal. Trump threw it out and started bombing again. Not Iran. Where are you getting your news?! Seriously. You are either willfully ignorant or a troll.

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

What would happen to the enrichment limitations in 2031 under the Obama deal?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

We're the religious nut jobs dude. (and Isreal) Free their people? Who has more imprisoned citizens? Iran or America? Do you have any idea how Iran's nut jobs can to power? We are making the same fucking mistakes we did 100 years ago. Also, only one nation has used nukes in violence. Acting as if we have the moral high ground here is alarming.

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Why would you want to compare them to the US to justify them getting nuclear weapons

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Why do you assume they are less virtues than us? Why do you assume they'll use them? Because those with true power. The ones dropping bombs on girl schools while trying to hold the high ground.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Circling back after Trump just sent billions to Iran with no nuclear guarantees. Iran has control over the straight. Israel's polling all time lows in the US. Iran is literally stronger today, than when you were typing that nonsense. I bet that Obama deal looks pretty good right about now. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 9 points 2 months ago

I'm more concerned about the USA's nuclear weapons at this point. Why can they have them, but Iran can't?

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

As few as possible imo

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Trump has single-handedly encouraged them to develop this program by destroying the Iran nuclear deal in his first term.

This is ALL his fucking fault.

[-] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

That's like saying Obama encouraged them by bringing it up as well

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

What? The Obama deal ensured they could enrich past nuclear power plant levels which is about 85% bellow bomb making. And getting to 95% or greater enrichment is extremely difficult.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

If that were the case, they wouldn't have killed the Ayatollah, the one man preventing Iran room having a nuclear weapon with his religious Fatwa against nuclear weapons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] amorpheus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Strait to jail.

[-] jimerson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
685 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30496 readers
1671 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS