504
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
504 points (100.0% liked)
Not The Onion
21216 readers
1784 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
So many people in the comments are asleep at the wheel.
Porn showing characters that are related having sex
Porn showing UNDERAGE characters having sex.
That's it. That's all this stops.
Which probably is already illegal in most places
This will stop very little to no additional porn according to what was said.
It's NOT a ban on showing step porn, only when one person is under the age of 18.
This solves maybe having. Some law to help prosecute things that are likely already being prosecuted but will do nothing to stop what has become popular.
Until they get people comfortable with that. Then it'll be porn that's deemed "degrading" or depictions of BDSM, or whatever they think they can sell you next. People who want to stop porn want to stop all porn. People who aren't religious psychos who fall for this kind of bullshit aren't really better than the religious psychos in any practical sense.
Signed, A guy who hates step porn, and is really pissed off to have to defend it.
Honestly they all kinda missed the boat when it comes to the "morality" vote, Boomers are dieing and Gen X while still having a lot of folks who want to be just like their parents, isn't as big a voting block. As for the newer generations studies show that they hold on to liberal ideas longer then previous generations and morality in the biblical sence isn't as important. Sure some shit will get passed, but I honestly feel they are in their death throws, (some things take a while to die and can fuck shit up in the process) I think this is why they seem to be more openly embracing the incel community, they need voters to replace the Boomers, on a side note this is also why I believe the LDS church seems to be backing the "tradwife" influencers, but that is mostly conjecture.
Opposing this isn't defending step porn - it's opposing illegalizing using minors in porn.
If it were actually about banning some kind of consensual porn between adults, then you'd be defending step porn by opposing it.
Opposing this is about opposing the normalization of porn bans. Making porn with kids is already illegal most everywhere, and making porn where someone pretends to be a kid is already illegal in the UK.
Defending this is defending backdoor theocracy.
Side note: dibs on Backdoor Theocracy as a band name...
Dibs on Backdoor Theocracy as a porn name
Backdoor Theocracy would be a good name for a brothel.
Pretty shocking that's not already illegal
I assume it already is illegal and this is a nothing burger. But absolutely quite disgusting if depicting underaged people having sex is not already illegal as well as depicting incest is not already illegal