213
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

AFAIK sodium chemistry batteries are the worst for mobile applications as they're much less energy dense meaning you'll have a heavier pack that needs to be charged more frequently, though it is cheaper for manufacturers to produce. I recall that these work best for grid power storage where size and weight aren't an issue.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

The packs CATL makes now are 175Whr/kg which is very close to LFP. They're already EV-worthy.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

That's great but emerging technologies are shooting for double or triple that amount, so why switch to something thats just barely reaching the equivalent potential of what's already old news?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Because it's safer, cheaper and works in cold weather.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

What EVs don't work in cold weather? Cheaper for the manufacturer for sure, and potentially safer though its not as if EV fires are some major epidemic.

[-] phx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

At a significant loss, yes. When it was really cold here that was about 30-40%

[-] Ithral 1 points 1 week ago

I can live with that, 100miles of range is more than I use day to day, so is 60miles. Winter road trips could be a pain, but that's maybe once a year

[-] phx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah I'd be happy with a safer battery with a bit less range if it also means it's more consistent in said range between seasons. It's good to know you'll make it to X next city/charger/etc regardless of temperatures

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I imagine vastly lower cost would be one reason. 450km range chargeable in 11 minutes would be enough for a significant proportion of people and likely desirable if the cost is low enough. I don't think it's likely that lithium would match the price/perf ratio of sodium so I think we're likely to see a lot more sodium in applications that don't require the absolute best energy density. So in a way, sodium might be the front runner, ahead of advanced lithium, in terms of what's going to be adopted. 😅

E: Also we're talking sodium batteries in production. If and when double-triple density lithium or another shows up, it might change the calculus depending on price, safety, etc.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Another big plus is that they don’t shit the bed when it gets cold.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Yup, and that's exactly what we need for transitioning the entire grid to renewables. Mobile applications should be a marginal/convenience thing compared to actual infrastructure.

[-] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Not the worst, they are still much better than traditional lead-batteries, but worse than lithium. Cheap, low-range EVs are an option however.

Other than that, you're right. They are much more useful for grid storage, where energy density is way less important than cost.

[-] davetortoise@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

EVs are not the primary application for sodium ion batteries, I dont know why this post is trying to focus on that. The really exciting application is cheap grid-scale energy storage, making renewables even cheaper than they already are.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
213 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55643 readers
2603 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS