429
submitted 2 weeks ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] signup@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

what do you want him to do? to break the law?

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 weeks ago

There's no need to follow an unjust law, nor a law that makes you an unethical person.

"Software not for distribution or use in California" (aka: "offer void in Nebraska") is a perfectly valid compliance, btw.

[-] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 12 points 2 weeks ago

There's also going the Ageless route and making protestware.

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah they seem to be absolutely fun.

[-] bamboo 10 points 2 weeks ago

And if you comply with unjust laws, then it's way harder to challenge them in the courts.

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

You can't put license conditions on LGPL code. Surprised you got 49 upvotes with nobody explaining that.

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Are you sure? LGPL and other *PL licenses do already include terms where the rights and privileges granted by the license are limited by local applicable law, and this would be simply a case of denoting one of a number of local laws that apply.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

I want him to do nothing.

He doesn't work for a distribution or a system integrator. He isn't the maintainer for systemd either. He's a random contributor, and he works for a cloud company that doesn't make or sell the sort of devices these laws apply to.

These age verification laws did not require Dylan Taylor to take any actions. He did that all on his own.

[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Who is going to arrest/fine FOSS developers for not doing anything about that? Would Brazil and US states go after uuuh, the systemd developers? What about distros not using systemd, like Slackware. Who is ultimately responsible for a collaborative project? Are they gonna send the police after Torvalds?

Plus, other countries don't have this obligation.

All that dev had to do is nothing. Instead he chose to comply with something that was never asked.

[-] Mordikan@kbin.earth 16 points 2 weeks ago

And how exactly would that be breaking the law?

Systemd isn't an operating system provider and has no legal obligation to make any change.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

lol, what? You mean the law in a handful of states and Brazil? Why should the entire world be affected by this?

[-] ttyybb@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

The beauty of FOSS is that if people want, they can just fork it and keep what they don't like out

[-] firelight@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago

Some laws need to be broken.

Have you learned nothing from history?

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
429 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

64468 readers
314 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS