379
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 151 points 3 weeks ago

Linux is easier to use than trying to registry hack your way into a local account.

[-] Unknown_0671 92 points 3 weeks ago

no, im a linux user. if someone doesnt want to dedicate time to adopt and learn, linux isnt "easier". even if linux was as easy as windows (idk it can even be compared tbh); its different. different requires time and effort, if someone cant do that (for any reason, this isnt a judgement), its not an easy move.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 43 points 3 weeks ago

My wife is not technical and has no interest in adopting and learning anything.

The web works the same way regardless of the OS, and LibreOffice has all the same features as Word that she uses.

The "hard part" is choosing and upgrading hardware, and maybe installation (depending on distribution).

I mention this because I think we should evaluate these differently. With a preloaded desktop/laptop, I've had no issues with anyone that actually relates to Linux (except my BIL who was trying to build an arcade stick for gaming).

Explaining to my other BIL how to select hardware for his custom build, that took some time, as did guiding him through the installation.

[-] Unknown_0671 30 points 3 weeks ago

im sorry but LibreOffice might have all the features of word but it certainly has a really bad user experience. i write often and libreoffice writer is difficult to say the least, not because of lack of features but a lack of most 'little things' and 'tweaks'. i can definitely see someone switching to libreoffice from word, but saying its not 'hard' is untrue or a biased take in my opinion and using both suites (more familiar with libre though lmao).

i do agree that for a mostly web based user as is commonplace nowadays, a preloaded linux thats been decently built is gonna be a significantly easy switch.

on a slight tangent, but linux for me was a way to rebuild my love for computers after windows systematically fucked things. and i really enjoy the learning process. so personally i still encourage people to spend the time in the learning process atleast a bit

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 31 points 3 weeks ago

i write often and libreoffice writer is difficult to say the least, not because of lack of features but a lack of most ‘little things’ and ‘tweaks’.

I think you're missing the fact that you are doing more 'expert' things than most here. The majority of the time, my wife opens a document she made once, saves as a new file (no, she's not using templates - don't get me started), and writes her invoice. She then PDFs it and sends it via email.

She does the same thing with Calc and a previously made blank "monthly calendar". Opens the blank, saves for the client, enters in the days and renames the month at the top, notes what she'll be doing for them on each day with an hour estimate, PDF and email.

That is the kind of thing most people do.

[-] Unknown_0671 39 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 16 points 3 weeks ago

I was seriously considering posting it but didn't want you to think I was being a dick about it 😀

[-] Unknown_0671 11 points 3 weeks ago

appreciated, reality checks are best served plain

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, LibreOffice stuck with the old UI/UX for better and worse. Luckily we do have a nice selection of Office Suites in addition to them. OnlyOffice, WPS Office, Collabora, KDE Calligra, Softmaker Office… surely there's one for everyone on Linux.

Personally I like OnlyOffice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

I would say give onlyoffice a try. It's not FOSS but does have free tier for home use and it's what I go to for non-main work computer. Beats libre imo.

[-] Unknown_0671 5 points 3 weeks ago

i do use onlyoffice when i have to work with MSOffice docs, its very similar. but the emphasis on AI has irked me too much to make it a regular use

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 weeks ago

You need to dedicate time to adopt and learn how to get a local account on Windows and clear out the bullshit you don't want.

I recently switched to Linux. At first I was surprised at how easy it was to set up and get working, then I was annoyed at having to look up how to do every little thing I know how to do on Windows and considered switching back.

Then I booted into Windows and in less than 10 minutes was fed up the whole OS. I realized I had to look up things just as often as I was on Linux, but in Linux it was because I didn't know where it was, where as on Windows it was actively hidden from me and fighting me every step of the way.
Windows is in no way easier, It's just the struggle you've gotten so used to fighting with every single day that you've forgotten it exists.

[-] Unknown_0671 5 points 3 weeks ago

yea and if u think that 'switch' is not deidcated time to learn then idek. im not saying windows is easier or its bs its easier to bypass. but each step of window's bullshit for a used to user is gonna be less effort than a switch. if someone cant do that effort (for any reason), there isnt a way around it

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wheezy@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 weeks ago

I don't disagree in general. However, my mom has been running Linux with a Windows XP skin for almost 8 years now without knowing she's using Linux. Literally just keeps her from running a random .exe and she does everything on a browser anyway.

[-] jcarax@beehaw.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

In my experience, it's usually power users or basic users with very specific application requirements, who have trouble moving between operating systems. There's usually a FOSS alternative to those applications, but often requires reworking a workflow or upskilling more than they want to. But they're still basic users so it's more a speed bump than a road block.

So yeah, most people can switch to MacOS without an issue, and the vast majority of those can switch to a distro like Fedora or Ubuntu and quickly feel comfortable.

Power users get stuck in this situation where they've learned how to do advanced things in Windows, have things tweaked to support more complex and peculiar workflows, but often don't understand the actual concepts behind them. And even if they do understand the concepts, they still have to learn the alternatives in a new OS, and rebuild their workflows. Now, there's a lot more ability to learn behind the scenes about the why and how with Linux and BSD, so I'd argue they'd be better off to just suck it up and get started, and they'll be better off before long.

[-] Unknown_0671 22 points 3 weeks ago

and i also say this as someone who is required to use windows at work. i despise windows, its so much harder for me to use windows given linux been my daily driver for a long time. im annoyed at powershell, explorer, clunky shortcut behaviors, etc just about every second im on windows. its a nightmare difficulty for me, but i also refuse to ever relearn windows stuff. i do remember a time when it wasnt annoying as fuck to use, could be nostalgia or that people just adopt.

using windows as a linux user is a nightmare. but if someone is adopted to windows, the opposite is gonna be similar no matter what.

[-] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

I also use windows for work. Shits stupid. Search in the start bar for an app that's installed on your PC? Let's open edge and show you web results. Want to copy something out of teams? Here's a copilot link you just accidentally clicked. Thanks for accepting that TOS.

I'd love some say on my work computer but alas I'm a grunt.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well, the whole reason people have to "adopt and learn" is because M$ bought their way onto virtually every new PC sold back in the 90s, so people's first experience would be their "operating system."
Talk about leveraging anchoring bias.
I'd argue you'd have a hard time selling Windows to people if you were honest about it.

For just 145€ you get:

  • an operating system that assumes you're an inept idiot
  • ads in your application launcher
  • a screenshot taken every minute, which gets stored outside your control and analysed by "AI"
  • an invasive "assistant" that listens in on your microphone at all times
  • forced to create an account to log in to "your" machine, so we can collect even more personal data

Especially when the alternative is free and let's you do whatever you want with your hardware. And if you happen to misconfigure something you get to be an adult about it and learn from your mistakes.

[-] Unknown_0671 5 points 3 weeks ago

oh im not disagreeing with that. windows is not easy to learn (as i said in my comment response to my comment above) after u stop being used to it. i doubt its easier if u are new to it either. they definitely just bought their way into making it the status quo. like how chrome did with browsing the web. or google with gmail. or google with etc etc.

what i am saying is that ignoring the "adopt and learn" part isnt benefiting anyone

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t think you realize just how complicated it has become to administer windows these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UberKitten 24 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Shirasho@lemmings.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Can confirm. Just switched to Linux about 2 weeks ago. I am happy enough, but there was a brutal learning curve. This was for a distro that is user friendly, too. I was able to install just fine, but actually getting my environment set up is an ongoing process.

Many Linux distros are getting there, but they still aren't ready for casual users.

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Wouldn’t you have the same experience if you moved from iOS to Android, never having used Android before? Does that make Android not ready for casual use?

If you have used Windows your whole life, there will definitely be a learning curve getting used to Linux and whatever desktop environment you choose to use.

I personally have better experience having casual users use Linux than Windows.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 14 points 3 weeks ago

In fact, one has a similar learning curve going from Android to iOS (as I learned when I transitioned to iPhone) even if iOS is broadly considered more “user friendly.”

I think you’re onto something. Switching to Windows would be painful to anyone used to Linux regardless of all the philosophical differences simply because the OS works differently. Lord knows I despise MacOS despite people who use it saying, “it just works.”

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 6 points 3 weeks ago

I was only using "from iOS to Android" as an example. I believe it would be equally difficult going from Android to iOS. As you, I also despise using MacOS. It's a struggle, because I'm not used to it in any way.

[-] Shirasho@lemmings.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

There is a difference between going from a GUI based OS to a hybrid GUI/console OS.

For both iOS and Android the only difference is where things live. The processes are still the same.

This is not the case with Windows and Linux. If you want to install something in Windows you go to a website and download an installer. For Linux, you find out if there is a package. If not you go to a website and see if there is an app image or zip file. You then need to know where to place the downloaded file, how to get it running (making it executable), knowing how to chmod and chown (it is better to have to do it like in Linux, but it is an extra step), and how to add it to your desktop (there is no right+click and add to desktop/create shortcut option in Arch based distros like there is on Windows). If there is a service component you may need to go into command line and systemctl to enable it.

Your comparison to iOS and Android is not really appropriate.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For Linux, you find out if there is a package. If not you go to a website and see if there is an app image or zip file. You then need to know where to place the downloaded file, how to get it running (making it executable), knowing how to chmod and chown (it is better to have to do it like in Linux, but it is an extra step), and how to add it to your desktop (there is no right+click and add to desktop/create shortcut option in Arch based distros like there is on Windows). If there is a service component you may need to go into command line and systemctl to enable it.

I don't think I've ever followed that workflow to be honest. Except for when doing something niche and way above and beyond something a casual user would do.

Open the software center, search what you want. Click install. Done. I use the terminal to the same effect but that's by preference. Installing packages as you described is not at all recommended... They won't update with the system.

The "add to desktop" thing really depends on your Desktop Environment too. GNOME not really, KDE and most others yeah.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tomiant@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

I've been using Linux for 20 years. The learning curve is still too steep for me.

[-] orygin@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

I'm curious what setup you have to do?
I do some customization of KDE on my desktop, but for my laptops it's always install and use without the need to setup anything.

[-] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 4 points 3 weeks ago

Which distros are you using on laptop? I have a gaming laptop, I've been procrastinating on the switch because I dont want to lose some things. I really enjoy the control software for the lights and fans that it came pre-installed with, for example

[-] prole 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If anything, Linux gives you far more control over those things and it's usually much easier to do than in Windows.

I've been using Bazzite for gaming for over a year now and it's great. It is immutable though, so while you can do just about anything you can do in other distros, the process can be different.

I've seen a lot of people suggesting CachyOS lately for gaming, if you want something that isn't immutable.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think the learning curve is any harder than someone who's learning Windows for the first time.

It's just different. Honestly in some ways simpler IMO. But if you were a life long Mac user and touched Windows for the first time today you'd probably have a rougher time I think.

[-] UberKitten 6 points 3 weeks ago

get excited for a random system update to boot you to a GRUB rescue console soon!

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

When was the last time you used Linux? And what distro was it? Your complaints are a decade out of date.

[-] UberKitten 5 points 3 weeks ago

this exact situation happened about 3 months ago to my partner on a modern distro

[-] Qwel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You should give the name of the distro rather than just say modern. Ubuntu is "modern" and they broke the auto-updates for everyone some months ago. It's more about stability than modernity

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago
[-] UberKitten 11 points 3 weeks ago

yep, I have used many linux distros for 20 years or so, and they are certainly much harder to migrate to than checks notes pressing two keys and running a command to get a local account.

good luck getting more than a few hours into a fresh linux install without needing to use a CLI, lol

[-] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

yet you claim windows you need to also....checks notes run commands in cli

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prole 8 points 3 weeks ago

Why is it acceptable to use command line to setup Windows, but not Linux?

Bottom line is, if you're not willing to put the minimal effort in, then you shouldn't ever complain about Windows being shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] orygin@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

good luck getting more than a few hours into a fresh linux install without needing to use a CLI, lol

I use the terminal on my dev machine, but that's because of what I do. Never opened the terminal on my laptops.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 42beansinapod@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 weeks ago

I am a Linux user, I dual boot Kubuntu and Windows.

On Friday I bought a new game on steam, checked on protondb and it is platinum, tried to launch it and it failed. I tried 4 different proton compatability modes and it failed to launch each time. While I am a sysadmin and am well capable of troubleshooting it, I really just wanted to play that game so I rebooted into windows.

If I hadn't had that other win11 SSD in my machine, I would have had to not play that game because I had no energy to troubleshoot that on a friday night after fighting with linux all day at work.

Tldr: some times Linux is a seemless as Windows, but not always, even when it is supposed to be and is for others. Even if you have that activate windows watermark.

[-] Ilandar@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, these "hacks" are very easy. Easier than installing and learning even the most basic of Linux distros.

[-] Bongles@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

It's true. You run one single command in cmd, then follow the prompts. It literally highlights what you probably want too, nevermind the guide online. Even Linux mint you still have to learn where stuff is and what it's called. That's not hard, by any means, but this is literally a single command and then you're back to your routine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
379 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

65624 readers
97 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS