511
submitted 4 days ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 73 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In a civilized country these things simply wouldn't happen.
Not paying an employee is simply illegal, and If what is happening in USA now happened here, we have public funds guaranteeing any unpaid employee by any employer get their money. Usually used for private companies that go bankrupt.

USA is such a shitty country, their regulation is of the caliber that would only be expected of a very poor developing country that lack resources to do better.

I don't think most Americans are even close to understanding how shitty USA is as a country. It permeates everything because Americans accept their society to be shitty, because they kind of accept a minimal government that doesn't even work.

Having a country with a two party system that begs for stalemates, and then is incapable of handling a stalemate is such tremendous lack of foresight, I bet most kindergartens are run better.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 21 points 3 days ago

Not paying an employee is simply illegal, and If what is happening in USA now happened here, we have public funds guaranteeing any unpaid employee by any employer get their money. Usually used for private companies that go bankrupt.

Laws in most civilized countries simply say that if new budget is not passed in time the previous budget continues or default budget covering basic expenses (like federal workers salaries, bills etc.) is automatically created. Shutting down government is simply not an option.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

True, I have not heard of other countries that do what USA is doing with the shutdown.
Americans are such a bunch of amateurs on democracy, despite they were among the first to use it!
Or maybe because of it? They sorely need a major reform of their democracy. But it looks like it will probably be the wrong way to an even more authoritarian system.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The problem is that they were "early adopters" and created a system impossible to reform. Civil war was the perfect moment to do a major rewrite of the system. They had a human rights issue and their system proved completely unable to resolve it. Unfortunately instead of realizing it's broken and fixing it they did some minor changes and moved on. Now they have a constitution that is more of a holy book than legal document. No one understands it, the laws don't mean anything but it's sacred so it's impossible to even talk about changing it.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I think they can't because their constitution is a holy text from the heavens and therefore cannot be trashed (or archived) and rewritten from scratch.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It literally has amendments. The latest one was ratified in 1992. The founding fathers considered the constitution to be a living document, hence why there is an amendment process.

Ironically, the people treating the constitution like gospel are the same people that keep ignoring it.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 days ago

It's the thing conservatives do. They just say stuff for effect and don't care about truth or consistency.

The Constitution is a perfect document that must be upheld when it suits their goals, and a living document that must be updated when that suits their goals instead. They are liars. They should not be accepted in polite society.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The same founding fathers that apparently thought it was a document that would probably be replaced after a few decades? (Or is this something everyone says that has no basis in reality? )

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Maybe? I don't recall them suggesting that it should be replaced every few decades.

Worth pointing out that there is a process in the constitution for changing the constitution, but there is no process for replacing the entire document. So I'd say there is pretty obvious intent for the document to change/evolve over time.

Hypothetically, we could amend the constitution to have a process for replacing the whole document though.

[-] lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yep, if a parliament fails to pass budget "Supply" legislation in Australia there's an automatic procedure that desolves the government and sends them to an election.

And the public hate elections. Do it to them out of sequence without good reason? You're not getting back in.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

And I guess all the ministers lose their seats, that would also be motivation to get it done.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 35 points 4 days ago

I don’t think most Americans are even close to understanding how shitty USA is as a country.

They're brainwashed from birth to believe they're the greatest country in the world. Most of them never question it. Those that do need years to overcome the beliefs embedded in their heads.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Yes American exceptionalism is pretty crazy.

The arrogance of calling a national championship "World Series" is a very clear example of that, and also calling the country America is another blatant example of exceptionalism.
It is this exceptionalism that makes Trump believe he can bully the rest of the world into submission. But all it will do is accelerate the fall of USA from being the de facto world leader.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Series_champions

[-] odelik@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

Hey now, it's the World Series because Canada is involved! Canada & USA is the entire world, right?

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Almost but not quite.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

The US lacks the resources to do better because the vast majority of its wealth is being hoarded by dragons. The peasants get moldy bread.

Hey I'll have you know as an American our kindergartens are run terribly as well, at least in poor school districts.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Sorry, my bad. 😋

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is the system republicans created and democrats cosigned. Republicans could at any moment dismiss the fillibuster and return these people to work but they've decided to let this happen to try and use media asymmetries to blame it on democrats in hopes they cave without negotiations.

Hopefully the democrats realize if they cave here they will never be elected again. Republicans will keep doing this until either they eliminate the fillibuster or they start caring about rules and the country so it makes sense for democrats to just hold the line and force some more permanent change in either republicans or the rules.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

We don’t have a “minimal government” because we still pay just as much in taxes and healthcare costs as everyone else. We just don’t see any benefits from that money, it all gets funneled to the oligarchs.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Well, if you have some other options you'd like to throw out there....

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Scandinavian model.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
511 points (100.0% liked)

News

32907 readers
2256 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS