937
lazy ass
(slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
937 points (100.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
9465 readers
1214 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
my old indeed account before/start of covid was close to 1000 jobs over the course of the year, most of them i wouldn't even get a reply, it got the point where if i had to make an account/do a 30 minutes form i wouldn't even bother trying because it just not worth it due to the instant bot rejection "Thank you for applying, Unfortunately..."
When i was a teenager, i was told to try and make 10 paper applications a week which felt like loads, I have always found it stupid that there isn't a job for everyone.
A lot of leftists, especially African Americans who suffer the worst under unemployment regimes, have been advocating for a jobs guarantee, ie. If no one else will hire you the government will, for a long time.
It just threatens the employer /capitalist class so it never happens. Because if you can always get a job with the government for decent wages and benefits you won't be forced to take a job at McDonald's where they pay you and treat you like shit.
It has happened, for example in the USSR the the right to a job was guaranteed to everyone who could work. The state invested so much into capital to mobilize the workforce, that by the mid-1970s there was 1 vacant for every 10 jobs! The average unemployment time was 2 weeks, and people unhappy with their job could literally leave it and go to another workplace easily because a vast number of positions was available. Must have been nice not having to worry about being allowed to freaking work to get a salary
While there were many reasons for the fall of the Soviet Union, their economy was one of them. I'm not sure it is a great model.
Hard diagaree. Full employment, guaranteed housing at 3% of monthly income, constant healthy growth of real wages without the cyclic economic crises typical of capitalism... None of that precipitates any political crisis.
Well, depends on what you compare it with. Before the Bolshevik revolution in 1917, life expectancy in the Russian Empire was less than 30 years of age, and 80% of the country were peasants, most of them not owning land and working for a landlord in exchange for miserable wages. After resisting the invasion by the USA, England, France and many other countries in the civil war that searched to reinstate the absolutist power of the Tsar, the country was wholly destroyed and didn't really recover until 1929. At that time, the largest industrialization effort ever seen at the time in the world was kickstarted, which led to economic growths of 10-15% yearly and to the defeat of Nazis. The abolition of hunger through the industrialization of agriculture and the defeat of Nazis arguably saved a hundred million lives from starvation and genocide.
By 1961, barely 30 years after the start of the industrialization, the USSR put the first human in Earth orbit, and by the mid 1960s there were more female engineers in the USSR than in the rest of the world combined. By the 1970s, the USSR produced more steel than the USA, built 2 million flats per year, and was the second world power.
All of this was achieved without exploiting the labour or resources of the global south and implementing the highest welfare the world has seen before or since. The dissolution of the Eastern Block led to horrifying crises all over: mass migrations, increased mortality through unemployment and hunger, suicide, alcoholism, crime, drug use, mass rural exodus due to the lack of funding of infrastructure... The poverty crisis hit very hard on Ukraine for example, with horrible demographic losses and an economy that by 2022 it hadn't recovered the 1990 level
We've even seen wars nationalist wars like the Chechen war, the war in Donbas, the bombing of Yugoslavia or the invasion of Ukraine. I don't see what part of the economic system doesn't seem good based on the outcomes of its dissolution.
Their issues weren't from having full employment.
[Edit: the economic challenges were in part] from the inefficiency of having full employment. I know this isn't the USSR, but there is a fascinating Netflix documentary called A Perfect Crime about the assassination of Detlev Karsten Rohwedder, a West German politician who oversaw the Treuhand agency. The Treuhand was responsible for converting over 8,500 state-owned companies in the former East Germany into private businesses. Most of it focuses on his death, obviously. But I found the economic aspect truly informative. Thousands of people lost their jobs because they produced inferior products too slowly to compete outside East Germany - and there wasn't enough economic power in the East alone to support it (there are one off examples of companies that bucked this trend, but they are the exception). Not any one individual's fault - but it demonstrates the challenges of the system - and a good use case for informing our own economic designs.
It seems like we were only about 30 years behind them