604
Important update
(piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
604 points (100.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
9354 readers
848 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You nailed the problem with the Eppstein files: they are about teenage abusers, not child rapists. His victims were teenage girls, not children.
Following the recent trend to view teenagers as children, you are already perceiving Trump as a pedophile child rapist. The release of the Eppstein files will not change this, I assume.
Following the traditional view that teenagers are adults-in-training, and should be allowed to work and marry, conservatives will not be put off by accounts of sex with young women they think fit for marriage. They might condemn it as immoral, of course, but they already accepted/ignored/forgave Trumps immorality. Would the release of the Epstein Files change their stance on him? I doubt it.
Ok, buddy... Try that argument out on the cops when you get busted for having nudes of teenagers on your phone... "The traditional view is that teenagers are adults-in-training; I was clearly just allowing them to gain valuable adult experience."
I bet the judge would absolutely adore that argument. I'm sure they'd see things your way.