578
beans 🫘 (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sunspear@piefed.social 92 points 21 hours ago

I'm sorry, but cum.

You can swear on the internet. And this isn't swearing even, it's just related to sex, you know, something natural

[-] Lyra_Lycan 49 points 18 hours ago
[-] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 11 points 18 hours ago
[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 14 hours ago

Typhus? How rude to wish a disease on this poor person!

[-] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 26 points 17 hours ago

It wasn't a censor, OP just got a little too excited

[-] Lyra_Lycan 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I'm with you. Censorship is killing my sanity. But here's the issue.

We already have content restrictions in place to "protect" under 18s whether they're mature enough or not to see porn or gore. Physical and digital media have PEGI, BBFC, etc. ISPs have parental control - the UK has Content Lock. We have parents with personal preferences for their offspring's access.

National or global censorship is useless. In their insatiable quest for power and money the corporations and governments are trying to turn the internet into a child's internet. If these are the lengths they're willing to go to, if their intentions were honest, it would surely be easier to let the adults have the freedom of adults and build a second internet for children. Maybe age lock that. Instead of killing everything consenting adults made.

This is equivalent to taking a bar, stripping out the slot machine, alcoholic drinks and erotic dancers, adding a ballpit, replacing live sports with cartoons and still checking ID at the door. Except now they want to swap ID for fingerprints.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

There are already multiple search engines only for children. It's only excuses to seize power over people.

[-] ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 4 points 12 hours ago

Just imagine the change that could go through social media platforms if, instead of censoring their content, users would just share links to platforms which allow them to freely share without unnecessary censorship.

On the other hand I'm a bit scared of what the rich assholes would come up with instead if they can't work themselves off at the enshitification of reddit et al..

[-] cobwoms 9 points 19 hours ago

these days it's not because people are trying to censor the content from the viewer, but they're censoring from the algorithms. they want their content to be seen, and algorithms will demote content when it has profanity. probably not the case on lemmy, but this was a screenshot from somewhere

[-] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

This is also why you‘ll see/hear the verb „unalive“ and have people refer to „seggs“.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
578 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16945 readers
1865 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS