233
submitted 2 weeks ago by Ulrich@feddit.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

windows is ass. i use only linux now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 66 points 2 weeks ago

Given the path of the US right now, this is the wisest decision any American can make.

[-] harmbugler@piefed.social 18 points 2 weeks ago

Indeed. Wise decision for everyone else too.

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 8 points 2 weeks ago

It’s a bit more urgent for US Citizens.

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why don’t they upgrade to a Canadian OS then?

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Arch started as Canadian. GhostBSD maybe?

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

I always thought OpenBSD was Quebec. I just learned now that it is based out of Calgary. Who knew?

[-] Diplomjodler@piefed.social 15 points 2 weeks ago

Soon the filthy commie anfifa OS will be made illegal there.

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

That would be 9front though.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

While true, desktops and laptops mean nothing now. Most people dont even have anything other than a phone.

If youre using android or ios, youre not private and you are being tracked 24/7.

Sadly my s23 only runs android and Linux phones aren't good enough yet.

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t even do email on my phone. I like the large monitor that doesn’t require glasses to see. Two monitors even.

I derive no joy from watching video on a phone.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, sure, in terms of OS choice.

I think there are some other decisions that give it a run for its money if you don't limit the scope to computing, though.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago

Given the state of the united states, and the world in general, gaining control over your personal privacy and security are fundamental to any other initiative you undertake

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

This. Also, get a VPN service, like Nord that's preferably not based in the US. Also, Microsoft is literally installing spyware on your computer already. (CoPilot and Recall). They would have NO problems turning over your computer data to the Trump regime on their whims.

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

I highly recommend mull and learning how to use vopono, it's an incredible combination.

[-] aeternum 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wat dis dud sed ⬆️

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You are aware that, unlike (e.g.) OpenBSD, Linux is (legally) an American product, right?

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I assume you mean The Linux Foundation.

While the LF is US based, the real “product” is the distro and you can choose a non-US distro. My distro of choice is based in Spain.

And, if needed, the kernel could be forked to anywhere in the world without disruption.

Many core programs are built primarily by US firms, like Red Hat, but even OpenBSD relies on many of those. Same story with the forking. OpenBSD maintains some of this themselves (like X11).

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

What kind of product do you think an operating system kernel is, whose development is driven by a US citizen (Linus Torvalds) under the patronage of a US foundation (Linux Foundation) and with significant involvement of several US companies (Red Hat, Microsoft, NSA) and is usually delivered with a whole host of software from US organisations (foremost: GNU), if not a US product?

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I do not consider a stand-alone kernel that does not ship to end users to be a product. But we do not have to argue definitions or semantics if you disagree.

Linux distros are certainly products though (paid or otherwise).

Russia can create a Linux distro, and even modify the kernel, regardless of the rules controlling US companies and foundations. They can certainly vet and remove anything they do not like as well. They just cannot distribute their code via linux.org.

The willingness of Linus to reject Russian participation in the kernel may have more to do with his being Finnish than his being American. There are many American sanctions and restrictions against Huawei (China) and yet they remain one of the largest contributors to the Linux kernel. They use their company email. And the US does not seem very anti-Russian to me (as a third-party to both).

Huawei is a Platinum sponsor of the Linux Foundation. Half of the Platinum Sponsors are from outside the US. Those foreign sponsors could easily establish a non-US based Linux Foundation if needed.

Thank your for saying “usually” regarding the the typical Red Hat/GNU platform (same software). I use Chimera Linux (based out of Spain) which skips a lot of that. It also adds some atypical Microsoft tech, a lot of Google tech, and a typical Linux kernel.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
233 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

58677 readers
392 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS