1354
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Twig@sopuli.xyz 591 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights" - Charlie Kirk, 2023

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 231 points 1 month ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago
[-] sepi@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago

But he doesn't know that. Don't ruin it for him.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago
[-] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 121 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ironically, this assassin literally justified the 2nd Amendment. You use it to off tyrants. And boy they sure did.

But this guy wasn't even a tyrant. He was just a fucking pawn. And there's going to be somebody else ready to step in and take his place.

This doesn't solve anything. It just gives the right a much needed distraction and the illusion of having an excuse to crackdown hard on the left. They would have done it either way, but this basically buys them cover.

[-] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Right? They've been treating the left so fairly this whole time and now we went and made them mad

*Edit - I misread OP's comment, and jumped on the wrong part.

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Literally the opposite of what I said but sure. Would love to hear what the fuck you believe this accomplishes to stop fascism or even right wing propaganda? If the administration actually dials it back after this, I guess I'll buy you a fucking drink and we'll have a good laugh about how right you were the whole time.

Every time something like this happens, I honestly wonder how many people are actually this clueless and how many are just astroturfing/trolls working on behalf of the right and this administration to spread disinformation and outrage propaganda. I would like to believe it's a ratio of about 15:85, but I'm also an optimist.

[-] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

I just re-read your comment and didn't see the words "illusion of," so I actually did misunderstand you and apologize.

I'll edit my comment to acknowledge that, but I'm still going to celebrate the dead fascist because it's the news we need right now

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But this guy wasn’t even a tyrant. He was just a fucking pawn.

Learn your fucking history. We hanged people at Nuremberg for doing exactly what Kirk did. Kirk was guilty of crimes against humanity. He's guilty of incitement to genocide.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Streicher

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So was this guy put on trial or was he just executed (allegedly by a civilian sharp shooter) during a time when the president keeps making false claims about needing to militarize American cities due to a lack of law and order?

Funny you bring up this guy going to Nuremberg bc I was actually just thinking the other day how different history might have turned out of we'd actually put the major players like Hitler or Mussolini on trial in front of the rest of the world.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Obviously this was a case of vigilante justice. But the man made his whole living trying to incite genocide against innocent people. The US government just blew up a boat full of Venezuelans, murdering them without trial, on the accusation of them being drug smugglers. Our closest ally, Israel, routinely executes people without trial for doing far less than what Kirk did.

The 2nd Amendment is always cited as being to protect against tyranny. That obviously entails extrajudicial violence. If there is ever a valid use for extrajudicial violence, it's in the prevention of genocide. The president will do all the evil he was going to do anyway. But he's a fascist, of course he's going to do that.

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to shed a tear for this guy. His last words were an attempt to incite violence against a minority group. If there is a Hell, he's burning there right now.

Those who live by the sword will die by the sword. He got exactly what was coming to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Show me any of these fascists being tried and convicted in a fair and just court, and I'll believe you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

It just gives the right a much needed distraction and the illusion of having an excuse to crackdown hard on the left.

"Don't fight back against Nazis or they'll get angry and start a crackdown? "

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deacon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Lost me at

They would have done it either way,

Right, so…someone bought them cover from all that accountability that is going around from the…democrats, or the Supreme Court, or the military, or?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The US has been at that point for months already. Fascists will find OR manufacture any excuse they want to do their fascist things. They don't need pretexts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 month ago

To quote Jesus: live by the sword, die by the sword.

That’s all that comes to mind.

These people who have been pushing for getting rid of trans people and throwing immigrants in concentration camps, and generally just calling for (and profiting from) hate need to realize doing so only has one consequence: more hate. Hate boils into violence.

People can pray for him, but he did not live a life according to Jesus’ teaching when he preached hate.

[-] dandelion 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In 2024, Kirk cited Leviticus 20:13 ("If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them") as "God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters".[105]

Kirk argued against gender affirming care for transgender people, saying, "We must ban trans-affirming care — the entire country. Donald Trump needs to run on this issue", according to Media Matters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk

Just in case there was ambiguity for anyone, he suggested we kill homosexuals, and ban life-saving healthcare for trans people.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

He was literally debating trans people as mass shooters when shot according to the reports I read.

[-] shani66@ani.social 6 points 1 month ago

yep, it was perfect timing. well, technically, he was just starting to run away towards racism (the bullet hit when he was trying to pivot to gang violence to avoid answering how many cishet white boys do shootings a year).

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 month ago

The important takeaway here is, we know he'd be happy to have been shot. I think that victim statement should be taken into account in the eventual trial.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

It's just... too poetic. I wish we weren't here as a country, and that's so heartbreaking, but we've been heading here for years if not decades.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

He became the sacrifice he hungered for, good riddance

[-] Xella@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

LMAO what a quote.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
1354 points (100.0% liked)

News

32784 readers
3085 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS