804
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
804 points (100.0% liked)
Showerthoughts
37090 readers
1457 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah tbh. And it aligns better with the concept of sexuality/gender being more of a spectrum than rigidly designated buckets.
Isn't the rainbow meant to represent the spectrum. Like how rainbows show the visible spectrum of light?
It would be a lot prettier that way
Are you trying to get the entire dcip3 banned??
I thought of this because of your comment.
God's rainbow has 7 colors (ROY G BIV), the LGBT rainbow has 6. Guy doesn't even know rainbows.
Ironically Bryan doesn't even understand the Bible, as God in the very Bible is described with not just masculine but also feminine and neutral attributes.
They for example are described as being beyond humankind, yet the latter proceeding forth from them. Guy, gal, all proceeding forth from God; in other words, God isn't a man, woman, but beyond either.
It's ragebait that he posts and either he knows what he's doing (likely), or he's just that dumb/hateful (also likely).
The Bible itself is also pretty contradictionary. For example. God punishes slavery, by releasing the refugees from Egyptian servantry; yet he rewards Adam for snitching on Eve, and makes Eve a slave to him.
The closest analogy to the fictional God is a power-tripping CEO like that of United Health.
These are all straight lines, give me the real gay flag
Sure it has every color but does it have our specific color?
Yeah, this flag only shows saturated hues. This is unsaturated erasure.
Might I tempt you with this alternative proposal?
I complain about saturation representation and you reply with a hue-lightness flag. Smh my head.
It... is kind of a giant mess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_flag_(LGBTQ) is a good summary but the modern rainbow color scheme is a somewhat recent iteration.
But much as "LGBT" has become "LGBTQ" and "LGBTQIA" and "LGBTQIA+" and so forth, so too have the flag added and removed stripes. And... a lot of that is intentional animosity since a shocking number of LGBTQIA+ folk are actually REALLY bigoted (the old "jokes" about how bisexual people need to "choose a side" and so forth) and it becomes a whole thing.
I love the intersex-inclusive progress pride flag, which adds designs to the left that explicitly include three under-represented groups (BIPOC, trans+, and intersex).
I once had someone, in earnest, complain at me that if we kept adding chevrons, the flag would have to get wider, and showed me an image that was like 1000 pixels by 20.
And then got mad at me when I asked if I could have that as a scarf :)
Personally, the way I view it, the rainbow is most flexible, as it literally includes everyone (queer and nonqueer), and the progress pride (as in, pride + triangle with whatever is in there) mostly functions as an acknowledgement of especially repressed groups.
View it like how countries have their national days, or how there are weeks of reading focused on a particular theme or subject (school homework included). That, but for queer stuff.
The initialism, "LGBTQIA+", feels disrespectful too. First because of everyone who falls under the "+" not being as important apparently, but second because it's just a silly sounding name.
I've heard "Sexual and gender minorities" or "SGM" as a more academic and professional sounding replacement, and I much prefer it.
After a while, the acronym just gets too long, especially when you have people complain that their particular group isn't "properly" represented because their letter isn't actually included in the acronym other than the "+" and it reminds me of that rap group OFWGKTA with all their ridiculous letters.
I do agree with the "SGM" abbreviation when referring to all groups under the LGBT+ acronym.
I haven't really heard of those jokes and animosity. We're not letting ourselves get divided, though.
Comrade, remember that the fight is not with other queers, but with those who repress everyone; the oligarchs.