172

Apparently I'm now a shitlib for not buying into this disgusting tankie propaganda that it was all the Wests fault and Stalin had to ally with Hitler.

For a mod who loves to ban others for bad jacketing, they sure have no problem doing it to other anarchists.

The Ban:

The Context:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

I'm actually an anarchist, but you're gonna use whatever pejorative makes you comfortable

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

You just like to say you are. You're anti-ukraine and from russia. You put up more tankie posts and anti-dem posts than anything critical of the repubs.

You're a tankie.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago

The reason I am often pissed at the democrats is due to how bad they are at actually opposing the republicans.

You're just a 'team blue' maga type

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You’re just a ‘team blue’ maga type

What does that even mean? It's sure not an explanation for how the public record of your actions (and oft expressed opinons) appears to wildly differ from the values you're claiming to hold...

[-] prole 19 points 3 weeks ago

It means, "If I say this, you can safely ignore anything else I have to say"

[-] yucandu@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

I wish we could just ignore these people, but disinformation is contagious.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

What does 'team blue' maga mean?

The guy I was responding to has in this very thread said:

In response to criticism of 'the west': 'you don't like it? leave'

Please move to russia or NK. You tankies enjoying western civ while shouting down at how evil we are, is rich.

That's like something I would unironically hear from a republican

Upholding 'western civilization' because capitalism somehow lifts people out of poverty, again this could easily come from a maga republican, this person just happens to be on team blue.

Western civ like it or not has pulled more people out of poverty than any other civ in human history

For me 'blue maga' are the people who are western chauvinists but act like they're above it all because they voted for 'the good guys' running the soul harvester.

It’s sure not an explanation for how the public record of your actions (and oft expressed opinons) appears to wildly differ from the values you’re claiming to hold…

Is being an anarchist somehow contingent on passing a geopolitical opinion litmus test? I organize with anarchists, I shit on the russian government all the fucking time for being a capitalist shithole. I shit on the US government all the fucking time for being a capitalist shithole. I happen to have ended up living in the US due to the various political upheavals in mine (and my parents) lifetimes. As a result I tend to criticize the US more directly as I am not a fan of my taxes getting turned into dead children abroad.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Lol you clearly don't know me, scan through my posts and see if you think I'm blue maga or whatever the fuck. I fall more on the social libertarian side than anything else. I'm very critical of the dems, but I'm not also a fucking idiot who thinks that the fascist shit pile we currently have is somehow the same as the dems by any means. The dems haven't gone full fascist... it's pretty clear they'd also not be destroying the US or harming it's allies...and would be supporting Ukraine. Something you clearly are against...so to me you're a tankie who sides with maga and fascist.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"Blue MAGA" is literally the singular best example of tankies parroting fascist rhetoric and is open evidence of their not so quiet collaboration. What a perfect parallel to the original topic of this thread!

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

“I’m not racist because Islam isn’t a race”

Not to shine too bright a light on this, but you kinda have a habit of finding a single sentence that out-of-context supports your position and then jumping the gun by citing it. Did you read the immediately previous sentence, where they provide that quote as a clarification of their pro-palestine position and then go on to repeatedly defend Palestinian lives and decry the actions of Israel despite their (Palestinian) religion's general stance on the LGBTQ+ or other political and social issues? Here:

You don’t label a civilian death as a hate crime just because they’re a certain race or gender. So no you’re statement is blatantly false.

Honestly I don't know how well I'd get along with SupraMario (they were pretty islamaphobic a year ago and don't seem to know what anarchists actually espouse) - but this is beside that issue: it's aggravating as heck to see these comments. You're clearly intelligent, but you're just too eager to respond and it keeps making you look foolish. If you'd just slow down a little and get the context in which things are said, you'd be a much more persuasive advocate for your beliefs.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not an Islamaphobic, I'm just not naive to think that Islam isn't less violent than other religions. I can support the people trapped under its weight, while still denouncing the religion...hell I feel that way against most religions because of how oppressive they are. This doesn't make me somehow a religious-phobic of one religion, I just don't like that people are naive of said religion because it's being currently at war with itself and anyone that doesn't agree with it, and tons of innocent people are dying under it. It doesn't give it a pass.

The Christian right is doing the same shit, sans the beheadings and stonings of women and LGBTQ+, here in the USA with removal of LGBTQ+/womens rights, and everyone is in agreement that it's fucked up...yet the same people will defend islam???

Please make that make sense.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I should say that after a review of your post history I'm quite sure we'd get along, I really only included that as an allusion to magnanimity. Religion is a difficult topic, all too often the discussion of any major trend amongst it is rebutted with specific examples of contrary behavior from a subset of the group. Maddening.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

the original comment they responded to in that thread was this:

Israel is probably the nr. 1 murderer of trans people in the world right now. Get your priorities straight.

moving the goal posts to 'hate crime' doesn't change that point.

'Israel' and its US accomplices are the #1 murderer of trans people in the world right now, statistically speaking, even if it is indirect.

SupraMario can say that that israel 'sucks', but then redirecting to 'but hamas,' or 'Islam in general bad' doesn't bolster that position. Maybe they actually don't like seeing US taxes get turned into dead children, but considering how strongly they feel that the west is best I'm not holding out hope.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Says the person literally doing a "but Ukraine, Nazis" so russia ok to kill and take over Ukraine.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

I'm actually opposed to all inter-capitalist conflicts. Ukraine may have a bunch of Nazi gangs running wild, but I don't think it's 'ok' to invade. It just gets more people killed and the situation spirals out of anyone's control. I can understand the rationale, but there's also other motivations.

got any more thoughts to share about anarchists, or maybe thoughts about NATO destroying Libya or US invading Iraq?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

I can understand the rationale, but there's also other motivations.

Lol what the fuck

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Nazi gangs running around killing people with no prosecution is bad; a brave take I know. Invading to 'stop' them is also bad.

There's plenty of reasons Russian capitalists go along with the invasion and it's not because they're opposed to nazis on principle.

How is this difficult to understand?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Nazi gangs running around killing people with no prosecution is bad; a brave take I know. Invading to 'stop' them is also bad.

There's plenty of reasons Russian capitalists go along with the invasion and it's not because they're opposed to nazis on principle.

Fuckin tankies....none of this is fucking true at all. It's an excuse to invade... Ukraine had/has a large population of Jewish people living there calling it home. There were no nazi roaming gangs killing people without prosecution. The fuck did you get this from "russian tankie today"?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

moving the goal posts to ‘hate crime’ doesn’t change that point.

This is like saying that Ukraine is slaughtering LGBTQ+ people because they’ve killed nearly 1/2 a million russian soldiers. You don’t label a civilian death as a hate crime just because they’re a certain race or gender.

They are not claiming that there must be a hate crime for something to be valid, just that the initial comparison is inherently foolish, and they are elaborating their position by using hate crimes as an example. It's a passable application of reductio ad absurdum.


SupraMario can say that that israel ‘sucks’, but then redirecting to ‘but hamas,’ or ‘Islam in general bad’ doesn’t bolster that position.

What Israel is doing is fucked, we should have stopped funding their damn military decades ago. What hamas and other jihadist are doing to people (women and LGBT persons mainly) in the middle east is also fucked. Both things can be true.

They explicitly clarify that their position is the direct opposite of what you're presenting it as.


You're doing it again, Diva.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

You’re doing it again, Diva.

doing what? they do the same to me every time they roll up to call me a tankie.

the point was that the US and its Israeli proxy have the most dead trans people on their hands right now due to killing civilians indescriminately.

I don't see what the comparison to Russian soldiers gets you in that quote, you realize that a war is different from a genocide of a captive population, right?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The initial premise is that there's been many trans deaths in Gaza. This is undeniable - that's just statistics. According to Hamas, there's been about 65,000 deaths in the genocide thus far. So it holds that there have been a horrifyingly large number of trans Palestinians killed.

The new premise as presented by SupraMario is that this is not the most deaths of trans people due to a conflict in the world right now, due to the war in Ukraine. The best count of confirmed deaths for Russian soldiers in Ukraine is around 80,000 (it is likely much higher, as their casualties are about 10x that number - but this is a very conservative measurement using only russian figures). By the same assumption as above, many of those 80,000 dead were trans. That's just statistics.

80,000 is larger that 65,000

I'm not sure how the political situation leading to someone's death changes their gender orientation.
...
I'm sorry, I don't really know what to say beyond that. It's pretty self explanatory.


doing what?

You're seizing sentences entirely without care for the context and presenting them as evidence for your position. It reflects badly on your commitment to a good faith discussion, as it keeps happening, and has been repeatedly demonstrated.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

there’s been about 65,000 deaths in the genocide thus far

That's the amount they've been able to confirm and count, not including all the indirect deaths caused by the enforced famine and widespread destruction of all civil infrastructure, it's in the hundreds of thousands.

it also feels like whataboutism, especially to have been bringing up military casualties in a peer conflict rather than a genocide of a captive population. Reducing them both 'conflicts' also kind of minimizes whats happening in Gaza.

It reflects badly on your commitment to a good faith discussion,

What good faith discussion? the one that started with people calling me a tankie?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So Hamas, the government managing this, can't be trusted to report on it's own citizen's deaths - but a 40-year-retired diplomat to japan is a credible source? (Btw no, that figure explicitly includes deaths by famine and related wartime deprivations. One second on google and you'd know that. Hamas are actually capable of counting the piles of their own dead children - they've had more than enough practice by now.)

And pointing out that a claim is, by their own logic, mathematically incorrect is not a whattaboutism. Come on.


Namecalling isn't the discussion I was referring to, though I'll grant that there's many conversational threads in this post so keeping them straight is a royal pain...

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Btw no, that figure explicitly includes deaths by famine and related wartime deprivations.

of course it should, it's a captive population being exterminated by the US and 'Israel'

I honestly don't know how you people can exist in the world and be posting stuff like that. it's not a war, it's a concentration camp being emptied of people


Namecalling isn’t the discussion I was referring to, though I’ll grant that there’s many conversational threads in this post so keeping them straight is a royal pain…

It's what started this thread

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yea that makes me racists because I'm not a hamas supporter while also not supporting Israel? Lol try harder.

Islam is a violent religion that doesn't support LGBTQ+ rights or womens rights...those are facts.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Islam is %100 transphobic and the main religion practiced there (98% of the population).

'not racist', you just have your finger on the pulse of the Islamic hive mind 👍

want to tell me more about how you feel about anarchists?

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
172 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1511 readers
2 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS