167

Apparently I'm now a shitlib for not buying into this disgusting tankie propaganda that it was all the Wests fault and Stalin had to ally with Hitler.

For a mod who loves to ban others for bad jacketing, they sure have no problem doing it to other anarchists.

The Ban:

The Context:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

“I’m not racist because Islam isn’t a race”

Not to shine too bright a light on this, but you kinda have a habit of finding a single sentence that out-of-context supports your position and then jumping the gun by citing it. Did you read the immediately previous sentence, where they provide that quote as a clarification of their pro-palestine position and then go on to repeatedly defend Palestinian lives and decry the actions of Israel despite their (Palestinian) religion's general stance on the LGBTQ+ or other political and social issues? Here:

You don’t label a civilian death as a hate crime just because they’re a certain race or gender. So no you’re statement is blatantly false.

Honestly I don't know how well I'd get along with SupraMario (they were pretty islamaphobic a year ago and don't seem to know what anarchists actually espouse) - but this is beside that issue: it's aggravating as heck to see these comments. You're clearly intelligent, but you're just too eager to respond and it keeps making you look foolish. If you'd just slow down a little and get the context in which things are said, you'd be a much more persuasive advocate for your beliefs.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I'm not an Islamaphobic, I'm just not naive to think that Islam isn't less violent than other religions. I can support the people trapped under its weight, while still denouncing the religion...hell I feel that way against most religions because of how oppressive they are. This doesn't make me somehow a religious-phobic of one religion, I just don't like that people are naive of said religion because it's being currently at war with itself and anyone that doesn't agree with it, and tons of innocent people are dying under it. It doesn't give it a pass.

The Christian right is doing the same shit, sans the beheadings and stonings of women and LGBTQ+, here in the USA with removal of LGBTQ+/womens rights, and everyone is in agreement that it's fucked up...yet the same people will defend islam???

Please make that make sense.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I should say that after a review of your post history I'm quite sure we'd get along, I really only included that as an allusion to magnanimity. Religion is a difficult topic, all too often the discussion of any major trend amongst it is rebutted with specific examples of contrary behavior from a subset of the group. Maddening.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

the original comment they responded to in that thread was this:

Israel is probably the nr. 1 murderer of trans people in the world right now. Get your priorities straight.

moving the goal posts to 'hate crime' doesn't change that point.

'Israel' and its US accomplices are the #1 murderer of trans people in the world right now, statistically speaking, even if it is indirect.

SupraMario can say that that israel 'sucks', but then redirecting to 'but hamas,' or 'Islam in general bad' doesn't bolster that position. Maybe they actually don't like seeing US taxes get turned into dead children, but considering how strongly they feel that the west is best I'm not holding out hope.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

moving the goal posts to ‘hate crime’ doesn’t change that point.

This is like saying that Ukraine is slaughtering LGBTQ+ people because they’ve killed nearly 1/2 a million russian soldiers. You don’t label a civilian death as a hate crime just because they’re a certain race or gender.

They are not claiming that there must be a hate crime for something to be valid, just that the initial comparison is inherently foolish, and they are elaborating their position by using hate crimes as an example. It's a passable application of reductio ad absurdum.


SupraMario can say that that israel ‘sucks’, but then redirecting to ‘but hamas,’ or ‘Islam in general bad’ doesn’t bolster that position.

What Israel is doing is fucked, we should have stopped funding their damn military decades ago. What hamas and other jihadist are doing to people (women and LGBT persons mainly) in the middle east is also fucked. Both things can be true.

They explicitly clarify that their position is the direct opposite of what you're presenting it as.


You're doing it again, Diva.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

You’re doing it again, Diva.

doing what? they do the same to me every time they roll up to call me a tankie.

the point was that the US and its Israeli proxy have the most dead trans people on their hands right now due to killing civilians indescriminately.

I don't see what the comparison to Russian soldiers gets you in that quote, you realize that a war is different from a genocide of a captive population, right?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The initial premise is that there's been many trans deaths in Gaza. This is undeniable - that's just statistics. According to Hamas, there's been about 65,000 deaths in the genocide thus far. So it holds that there have been a horrifyingly large number of trans Palestinians killed.

The new premise as presented by SupraMario is that this is not the most deaths of trans people due to a conflict in the world right now, due to the war in Ukraine. The best count of confirmed deaths for Russian soldiers in Ukraine is around 80,000 (it is likely much higher, as their casualties are about 10x that number - but this is a very conservative measurement using only russian figures). By the same assumption as above, many of those 80,000 dead were trans. That's just statistics.

80,000 is larger that 65,000

I'm not sure how the political situation leading to someone's death changes their gender orientation.
...
I'm sorry, I don't really know what to say beyond that. It's pretty self explanatory.


doing what?

You're seizing sentences entirely without care for the context and presenting them as evidence for your position. It reflects badly on your commitment to a good faith discussion, as it keeps happening, and has been repeatedly demonstrated.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

there’s been about 65,000 deaths in the genocide thus far

That's the amount they've been able to confirm and count, not including all the indirect deaths caused by the enforced famine and widespread destruction of all civil infrastructure, it's in the hundreds of thousands.

it also feels like whataboutism, especially to have been bringing up military casualties in a peer conflict rather than a genocide of a captive population. Reducing them both 'conflicts' also kind of minimizes whats happening in Gaza.

It reflects badly on your commitment to a good faith discussion,

What good faith discussion? the one that started with people calling me a tankie?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So Hamas, the government managing this, can't be trusted to report on it's own citizen's deaths - but a 40-year-retired diplomat to japan is a credible source? (Btw no, that figure explicitly includes deaths by famine and related wartime deprivations. One second on google and you'd know that. Hamas are actually capable of counting the piles of their own dead children - they've had more than enough practice by now.)

And pointing out that a claim is, by their own logic, mathematically incorrect is not a whattaboutism. Come on.


Namecalling isn't the discussion I was referring to, though I'll grant that there's many conversational threads in this post so keeping them straight is a royal pain...

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Btw no, that figure explicitly includes deaths by famine and related wartime deprivations.

of course it should, it's a captive population being exterminated by the US and 'Israel'

I honestly don't know how you people can exist in the world and be posting stuff like that. it's not a war, it's a concentration camp being emptied of people


Namecalling isn’t the discussion I was referring to, though I’ll grant that there’s many conversational threads in this post so keeping them straight is a royal pain…

It's what started this thread

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So you agree with that number? So then... why try to discredit Hamas' ability to count, and why did you bring made up numbers into this? Why are you jousting at strawmen about "you people" when nobody here is denying the genocide is a genocide? Why behave like this at all, when all you do is discredit the causes you support with your actions?

It is embarassing that we're on the same side. You're doing more harm to our shared causes than all the good you've possibly ever done.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

when nearly every hospital has been demolished it's not realistic to expect that their count is going to be the full picture. I don't know how else to spell that out to you, but the people who disappear under rubble or in the chaos of a hospital being destroyed aren't getting counted

It is embarassing that we’re on the same side. You’re doing more harm to our shared causes than all the good you’ve possibly ever done.

the feeling is mutual

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Do you ever think maybe you should read your sources before you post them? This is like the tenth time you've done this.

65,000 deaths

We estimated 64 260 deaths

I truly appreciate you finding a source that so exhaustively backs up my / Supra's earlier claims, and for resoundingly disproving your own. Which wasn't even my goal, I don't even care, the actual genocide is much more important than the semantics you are hyperfixated on. Just move on, dude.


(You can't even think up a better retort than "No, u"?)

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

it's from June 2024, over a year ago, I hope you at least acknowledge that conditions have deteriorated and systemic errors in counting will remain.

on the report it says that the underreporting is ~40%, if that has continued or increased since then it means that the current stated number in 2025 is going to have a similar undercount. If it's 65k as reported by Hamas now then the real number is probably 40% higher.

This whole exchange stems from the statement that the The US/Israel have killed more trans people via this genocide than anywhere else on earth currently. The counterpoint was that "oh by that logic it's actually Ukraine killing Russians" by obsessing over the numbers rather than the power dynamics at play you tip your hand about where you really stand.

I don't take you seriously enough to continue this further, 'dude'

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's from June 2024

So you actually didn't read the article or understand the first thing about their methodology / conclusions at all, huh? Or maybe you just forgot to notice that my 65,000 claim is also a year old, because you were quoting a year old comment that used that number? So either the Hamas government was aware of the reporting issue and corrected it (which they publicly did...) or man they sure were good at guessing!


Yeah, I'm glad you're taking my advice to just move on. This has not been a great look for you.

(edit: Those edits.... oof. oof. It's rare you see someone trying to do a revisionist comment history)

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Says the person literally doing a "but Ukraine, Nazis" so russia ok to kill and take over Ukraine.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

I'm actually opposed to all inter-capitalist conflicts. Ukraine may have a bunch of Nazi gangs running wild, but I don't think it's 'ok' to invade. It just gets more people killed and the situation spirals out of anyone's control. I can understand the rationale, but there's also other motivations.

got any more thoughts to share about anarchists, or maybe thoughts about NATO destroying Libya or US invading Iraq?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I can understand the rationale, but there's also other motivations.

Lol what the fuck

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nazi gangs running around killing people with no prosecution is bad; a brave take I know. Invading to 'stop' them is also bad.

There's plenty of reasons Russian capitalists go along with the invasion and it's not because they're opposed to nazis on principle.

How is this difficult to understand?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Nazi gangs running around killing people with no prosecution is bad; a brave take I know. Invading to 'stop' them is also bad.

There's plenty of reasons Russian capitalists go along with the invasion and it's not because they're opposed to nazis on principle.

Fuckin tankies....none of this is fucking true at all. It's an excuse to invade... Ukraine had/has a large population of Jewish people living there calling it home. There were no nazi roaming gangs killing people without prosecution. The fuck did you get this from "russian tankie today"?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yea that makes me racists because I'm not a hamas supporter while also not supporting Israel? Lol try harder.

Islam is a violent religion that doesn't support LGBTQ+ rights or womens rights...those are facts.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Islam is %100 transphobic and the main religion practiced there (98% of the population).

'not racist', you just have your finger on the pulse of the Islamic hive mind 👍

want to tell me more about how you feel about anarchists?

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
167 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1458 readers
74 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS