511
submitted 11 months ago by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

Man, if homeopathy worked, those guys could have been billionaires!

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago
[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

That's cool, but it's not homeopathy. That's micro dosing.

For it to be homeopathy, the peanut proteins would need to be so diluted in water, that hundreds of Olympic swimming pools full of the solution would be unlikely to contain a single molecule of peanut protein. All that's left is the water infused with 👋👋PeAnUt EnErGy👋👋.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Micro-dosing, so extreme homeopathy.

Edit, it's actually less than microdosing:

eat the protein equivalent of one 40th of a peanut every day for two weeks

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

Micro-dosing, so extreme homeopathy.

No, the other way around.

In micrososing and with this peanut thing, there are actually molecules of the thing you're taking in the solution, just very small amounts.

In homeopathy, there isn't any. At all. Zilch. None. Squat. Bupkiss. Nada. Elvis has left the building. Who? Dave? .... Dave's not here. This parrot is no more, it has ceased to be, it is bereft of life, it rests in peace. This is an ex-parrot.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

I don't know enough to argue about it, but I do know that there are some poisons that will kill you if you smell it.

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/another-damning-homeopathy-report/

Conclusion

Homeopathy is based on magical thinking. It does not have even the barest toe-hold in science or reality. In spite of this it has been extensively researched for its clinical effects. While most of this research is of poor quality, there is some reasonably high-quality research, which consistently shows that homeopathy does not work.

The extremely low prior probability combined with the negative clinical evidence is devastating to homeopathy. There is simply no rational justification for further investment in this pre-scientific and disproved notion. We do not need further research. No government should fund homeopathy, pay for homeopathic treatments, fund research, or even approve homeopathy in any official capacity. This means that homeopaths should not be licensed, and homeopathic products should not be approved.

And yet homeopathy still enjoys the support of most governments. This is largely based on a misunderstanding among the general public as to what homeopathy is, combined with lobbying by homeopaths and supporters of unscientific medicine.

Science clearly needs a stronger lobby.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Science clearly needs a stronger lobby.

Yeah, but that's so elitist to rely on things like facts, science and evidence.

This is 'merica, son.

There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

Isaac Asimov.

^ This is how we do things now, since a few million morons voted for the likes of Taco at least in part because "he's not a politician". These morons deserve to have their teeth drilled by "not a dentist", by the way...

Asimov says it eloquently, JR "Bob" Dobbs is much more blunt:

"Act like a dumbshit and they'll treat you like an equal."

[-] EldritchFeminity 4 points 11 months ago

Who was the general who said after the Civil War something very similar to Asimov? Something along the lines that the next Civil War in the US would be fought by the anti intellectuals against those who care about facts and the truth.

[-] prole 7 points 11 months ago

Just looking at the person's reply to this... They're not interested in learning anything.

Good try though

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Actually, the act of science needs better people talking about the studies, less greedy people deciding how the studies are presented, less insurance companies, less shitting on interns, and more promoting actual health. I had a friend ask a doctor about their 5 month cough and the doctor answered, "Well, what do you want me to do about it?" Oh I don't know, maybe fuck off?

Alternative medicine is cRaZY until healthcare finds a way to control it so they can make a shit ton of money off of it. Hippy magnets are found to actually change a persons thought patterns if you place them against your head in the right way, which makes me laugh my ass off. You now have hippy dippy light therapy being used by psychiatrists.

I think it's hilarious how much you guys fight this. If you just accepted that there are charlatans in every profession and chilled a bit, everyone would be much better off. Besides, even if it's all bogus, why are you trying to take away the placebo effect from people? It's still helping some of them.

[-] prole 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hippy magnets are found to actually change a persons thought patterns if you place them against your head in the right way,

Oh cool, can you provide a peer reviewed study supporting this claim?

You know what they call "alternative medicine" that actually works?

Medicine.

(Can't claim that one, took it from Tim Minchin)

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Oh cool, can you provide a peer reviewed study supporting this claim?

I could, but I won't, look it up. It's been in the past few months. It probably was in Science magazine since it's in my rotation, if that helps.

You know what they call “alternative medicine” that actually works?

Medicine.

LMAO, I said that 10 years ago, so it's not the dis you think it is. I 100% agree. The greeds will shit on anything they can until they can take it over, make a shit ton of money off of it and call it something else.

Last comment.

[-] ganryuu@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

You couldn't, because there's no actual study on this, because it does not work. It's also why you won't. Troll being a troll, block and move on.

[-] prole 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why not try to learn the actual reality of what's happening instead of holding your ears when someone presents something that counters your existing (incomplete) understanding?

It's honestly kind of sad to see

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Right back at you.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

Now see, if you’d have kept your mouth shut instead of letting the diarrhea keep falling out, we’d all likely have come away thinking you were just ignorant instead of a complete idiot.

[-] prole 10 points 11 months ago

Just literally read like a two sentence definition of "homeopathy" on Wikipedia or something, because you're literally confusing it with everything.

[-] prole 18 points 11 months ago

Definitely not homeopathy.

Unless it's the peanut's memory that you're absorbing, and that the less peanut that's in the final result that you take is, the more powerful the results become.

Because that's the stupidity of homeopathy.

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

~~Gooning~~

Microdosing on nut

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Wake me when they can eat a jar of peanut butter in one sitting like a teenager about to grow an inch overnight

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
511 points (100.0% liked)

News

38932 readers
1386 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS