536
submitted 2 days ago by andros_rex@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 123 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In case anyone's in any doubt about whether there's any factual basis for this:

Mass shooters are not disproportionately transgender, contrary to claims

This CNN article states it well:

Such a move would represent a dramatic escalation of the Trump administration’s fight against the rights of transgender Americans.

That's it. This is just the fascists finding another way to victimize trans people, because they enjoy doing that and it keeps the morons' attention diverted from real problems.

And this bit is also good in the article (warning: disgusting quotes from Trump admin people):

The goal of the potential ban, according to the Justice official, is “to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell.”

Because gender dysphoria is included in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, also called the DSM, it is diagnosed as a mental disorder. (The DSM is the handbook used by health care professionals as the authoritative guide in diagnosing mental disorders.)

But the gender incongruence – having a gender identity that’s not the one assigned at birth – isn’t what makes gender dysphoria a mental disorder. Having clinically significant dysphoria around the incongruence is what makes it a disorder.

That's surprisingly nuanced and well informed for an article on a mainstream news site.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 days ago

From what I understand, people with mental disorders (e.g. taking anti-anxiety meds) can still own guns. The threshold for being disallowed is if the person has been involuntarily institutionalized. So even if you have some kind of mental health crisis and check yourself in, that's voluntary so it doesn't prohibit you. It sounds hard to fit gender dysphoria into that framework.

OTOH apparently you're prohibited if you've used pot in the past year, so maybe they'll expand that to include vaccinations.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The logical direction this is going is that they want to do something bad and Nazi-ish to trans people. I hope it doesn't go that far, but they're rounding up other people already so people need to be ready for a fight.

[-] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago

And it won't stop at trans people like the "normal gays" seem to think everyone on the LGBTQ+ spectrum should be ready to flee/fight ASAP.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The way I look at it is: this isn't just trans people's battle. They just happen to have found themselves on the frontline of a war that's coming for everyone, so we all need to fight this together. If trans people lose rights, those are rights everyone else has lost too, because they're now a matter of the fascists' discretion so not really rights at all. If you're not their chosen victim today you may be tomorrow, and fascists' victim lists have no end but grow and grow. So it's for all of us to fight for trans rights today, because the attack on trans people is an attack on all people and we're in this together.

[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I would bet though that most made shooters are white though. Better male it so white people can't have guns...

Well lookie there, I was right

https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

Lol it's worse than that.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/476445/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-gender/

I wonder if there's a similar split for regular shootings rather than mass shootings.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well lookie there, I was right

No shit though?

You look at the largest racial population and wonder why it represents the highest raw number figure?

Looking at your source... (and taking population percentages from here... https://usafacts.org/data/topics/people-society/population-and-demographics/our-changing-population/)

White: 54.2% while representing 58.9% of the population
Black: 16.8% while representing 12.6% of the population
Latino: 7.7% while representing 19.1% of the population
Asian: 6.5% while representing 6.1% of the population
Native American: 1.9% while representing 0.7% of the population

The white population overall under represents per capita mass shootings. You SHOULD expect white people to make up the majority. They ARE the majority.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
536 points (100.0% liked)

News

32054 readers
2157 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS