580
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

You could always respond like a normal human being and get a doorbell cam. You can at least see what is going on and maybe go talk to their parents (if you didn’t live in a dystopia where people think it’s ok to just start blasting)

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

We don't have a doorbell cam because we live in a dystopia and I don't want the cops or the government to have visual access to my front door at all times.

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Self-hosting is an option if you’re tech-savvy enough

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago
[-] Gormadt 2 points 4 days ago

Everyday is a learning opportunity, all you've got to do is seize that opportunity.

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I've got two kids and a full time job. Every day is not a learning opportunity.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 4 points 4 days ago

Also savvy criminals would have jammers on. There is little question in my mind that tech bro bastards probably shut down all cameras they don't fully control if they go anywhere. They want all the privacy in the world while they probably want a nice shot of your ass as you take a dump.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

jammers

No idea why you need something as sophisticated as a jammer when you can just stick a piece of tape over the lense.

Either way, yeah. These cameras are more useful for a panoptican security state than any individual home owner.

And even then... not that beneficial.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago

Also kids playing ding dong ditch, aren't walking around with sophisticatedish tech like that!

[-] prole 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We're talking about children playing a harmless prank.... They're not bringing "jammers" with them. Point was that a doorbell cam would let them see that it's just kids goofing off. If the bell rang late at night, they looked at the cam, and it was all scrambled, I think it would be pretty safe to assume that wasn't ding dong ditch.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago

I was referring to actual criminals and not kids playing pranks.

Ring cameras absolutely have been hacked and jammed. The people who did that weren't kids being annoying. They were car theft rings who used the time that cameras were downed to steal cars.

[-] prole 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes, I understand. The point is, if your shit is being jammed, then you likely have genuine reason to be concerned. So the doorbell cam helps you realize they're not kids playing a prank doesn't it

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Lawl nobody bothering people at home for tiktok clout is carrying a fucking jammer

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Chances are astronomically low you know who the parents are. Maybe this is a legit use of that nextdoor app.

[-] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Given that kids sometimes play outside, or take some time to get loaded into or out of cars in a driveway, and I am also sometimes outside or driving to or from my house, I feel like I have a decent handle of what kids live where in a one block radius of my house. I may not know the parents, but I would know which door to knock on to meet them.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
580 points (100.0% liked)

News

32030 readers
3491 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS