729
submitted 22 hours ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tyra@lemmy.ml 14 points 21 hours ago

Good! I‘m grateful that the CCP is stepping in where the West is ignorant. Thanks to heavy lobbying by fossil fuels and car industries we would never have affordable cars in Europe without China. Thank you Xi Jinping for saving the climate 🙏

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 10 points 21 hours ago

LOOOOOLOLOLOL have you looked at China's greenhouse gas contributions lately? They don't give a fuck about the climate, they're just trying to drive other countries out of the market.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

Chinese carbon emissions may have peaked this year and they’ve deployed more renewables than the rest of the world combined.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 21 hours ago

That's because they're also heavily subsidizing that industry out of self-interest. That's the "emerging markets" I mentioned above.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

Which sounds like a good idea for everybody. Maybe other countries should do the same thing.

I’m no fan of West Taiwan but they’re doing a lot more to decarbonize than most other major economies.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Like always, it's a great idea, right up until China jacks up the prices after they've driven out all the competition and common people can't buy them anymore.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

Then maybe western companies can finally compete with them despite being ruled by obligate capitalists.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I think you may have glossed over the bit about jacking up prices. By then other countries be decades behind in development, not to mention competing with slave wages. There's no way. If there was, they wouldn't be doing it. CCP isn't doing this for the environment, they expect payback.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

So the Chinese tech will still be cheaper.

Gee, maybe sending almost all our manufacturing to another country was a stupid fucking idea

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 20 hours ago

Man I've never seen anyone shift quite so many goalposts in such a short time.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

What goalpost did I move? You said they’d be built with slave labor which means they’ll still be cheaper, right? And in the meantime we decarbonize huge segments of the global economy.

Don’t be mad just cause western countries wanted to take advantage of slave labor as usual and are getting bitten in the ass because of their greed, or that West Taiwan is doing it better.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago

What goalpost did I move?

This one:

Thank you Xi Jinping for saving the climate 🙏

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I never wrote that.

But if a side effect of utterly dominating the west in decarbonizing has the side effect of saving the climate I’m not gonna complain.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I never wrote that.

No, but you did jump into that conversation. If you were trying to have some other argument, you were arguing with a strawman.

But if a side effect of utterly dominating the west in decarbonizing has the side effect of saving the climate I’m not gonna complain.

There is no "saving the climate". There is only China dominating the industry and then pricing them out of the hands of common people, because they have no competition.

Another effect is destroying the global economy and further diminishing the wages of workers in the US and around the world. But hey, maybe you like being poor.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Good. I hate the global economy.

And maybe if the western countries had a lick of sense it wouldn’t end up this way. But we got addicted to cheap plastic crap and let the Chinese leapfrog us.

Because if we’d left decarbonization to the west it would never have happened.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago

Good. I hate the global economy.

I have no response to this.

[-] Amberskin@europe.pub 6 points 18 hours ago

They are subsiding the deployment of clean energy sources?

Good for them. And good for the world.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago

Sure, it's great for everyone, right up until it's not anymore because they've erased the competition and then jacked up the prices to the point that common people can't afford them, and further driven down workers' wages in the process.

Is no one else familiar with the concept of Predatory Pricing?

[-] tyra@lemmy.ml 6 points 21 hours ago

Oh no, a country acts out of self-interest! A concept that is completely foreign to the West 😱 At least their “self-interest“ has cheaper EVs for the rest of the world as a result. What are the coeffects of the US defending their self-interests? Rise in facism? Another genocide?

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

You're moving the goalposts. You were literally thanking Xi for "saving the climate".

Once again, I am not having a pissing match about which country is better, I am discussing the success of electric vehicles from China.

[-] tyra@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago

Not really? Still saving the climate 🤔

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

At least their “self-interest“ has cheaper EVs for the rest of the world as a result.

It cannot be both. Either:

  1. CCP is subsidizing EVs to "save the climate" and they will stay cheap and subsidized forever because the communist dictator is actually just a totally super nice guy who cares about the global climate.

  2. CCP is subsidizing EVs to dominate the global market, after which prices will go sky high and economies around the world (including yours) will suffer, because they've driven out all of the competition.

Which one do you think it is?

[-] stephen@lazysoci.al 7 points 20 hours ago
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago

That's per Capita, China has like 30 billion more citizens.

[-] stephen@lazysoci.al 9 points 20 hours ago
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago

So then you agree you were wrong...?

[-] stephen@lazysoci.al 6 points 19 hours ago

No. Your argument is for fools. The argument that a country with a population of 345 million produces less carbon dioxide to pollute the planet’s atmosphere with than a country of 1.42 billion people is nonsense and contributes nothing to any conversation at all. The per capita comparison is what matters, but it’s not used by the people that just really want us to believe “China == bad”. Seems like they’re successful at it based on this interaction, sadly.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Oh okay so basically you were wrong but it doesn't matter. And I've been duped into hating a communist dictatorship that censors all public discourse and has exploited slave wages for the last several decades. Got it.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Per capita is the measure that counts, why should Americans be allowed to put multiple times more CO2 into the air than other people?
You are a stinking American exceptionalist.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 18 hours ago

They also manufacture the rest of the world's shit. So all in all they're pretty clean for how big they are.

[-] Amberskin@europe.pub 3 points 18 hours ago

Maybe YOU should give another look at those figures.

Specially the ones relative to the % of new renewables put into production during the last years.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
729 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74545 readers
3706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS