I was reading and comparing the use of textual info in the book references and how he identifies with something.
The author considers himself transmasc but not entirely male.
And the book only mentions pronouns and such as well as his new name.
Okay, we understand on an invidual level. We just have a dislike for calling he/him masc or she/her femme on a societal/global level since pronouns are not inherently gendered.
I was reading and comparing the use of textual info in the book references and how he identifies with something.
The author considers himself transmasc but not entirely male.
And the book only mentions pronouns and such as well as his new name.
Okay, we understand on an invidual level. We just have a dislike for calling he/him masc or she/her femme on a societal/global level since pronouns are not inherently gendered.