686
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
686 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
426 readers
269 users here now
Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
- No paywalled sites at all.
- News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
- No videos.
- Post only direct links.
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
- Al Jazeera;
- NBC;
- CNBC;
- Substack;
- Tom's Hardware;
- ZDNet;
- TechSpot;
- Ars Technica;
- Vox Media outlets, with exception for Axios;
- Engadget;
- TechCrunch;
- Gizmodo;
- Futurism;
- PCWorld;
- ComputerWorld;
- Mashable;
- Hackaday;
- WCCFTECH;
- Neowin.
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
- Archive links in the body of the post.
- Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
I really feel like scrapers should have been outlawed or actioned at some point.
But they bring profits to tech billionaires. No action will be taken.
No, the reason no action will be taken is because Huawei is a Chinese company. I work for a major US company that's dealing with the same problem, and the problematic scrapers are usually from China. US companies like OpenAI rarely cause serious problems because they know we can sue them if they do. There's nothing we can do legally about Chinese scrapers.
I thought Anthropic was also very abusive with their scraping?
Maybe to others, but not to us. Or if they are, they're very good at masking their traffic.
I use a tool that downloads a website to check for new chapters of series every day, then creates an RSS feed with the contents. Would this be considered a harmful scraper?
The problem with AI scrapers and bots is their scale, thousands of requests to webpages that the internal server cannot handle, resulting in slow traffic.
Does your tool respect the site’s robots.txt?
Unfortunately, robots.txt cannot express rate limits, so it would be an overly blunt instrument for things like GP describes. HTTP 429 would be a better fit.
Crawl-delayis just that, a simple directive to add to robots.txt to set the maximum crawl frequency. It used to be widely followed by all but the worst crawlers ...It's a nonstandard extension without consistent semantics or wide support, but I suppose it's good to know about anyway. Thanks for mentioning it.
I was responding to their question if scraping the site is considered harmful. I would say as long as they are not ignoring robots they shouldn’t be contributing significant amounts of traffic if they’re really only pulling data once a day.
Yes, it just downloads the HTML of one page and formats the data into the RSS format with only the information I need.
Seems like an api request would be preferable for the site you’re checking. I don’t imagine they’re unhappy with the traffic if they haven’t blocked it yet
I mean if it's cms site there may not be an api, this would be the only solution in that case