681
Which way? (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To anyone who gets this: ~~do not let the podiatrist convince you to do the partial removal~~. Ask your podiatrist if a full nail avulsion could be preferable to a partial avulsion if minimizing chance of reoccurence is the most important factor to you. Ie, removing a tiny strip from one or both sides of the nail. It is HIGHLY likely it will get bad again. Have them do a full phenol cauterization and remove the entire nail. You dont need it, and you'll be better off without it. However, I'm no doctor.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

gives medical advice explicitly in opposition to a hypothetical doctor

says they're not qualified to give medical advice because they're not a doctor

leaves

Your personal experiences with procedures are valid, fam, you can just say it didn't do you or a friend any good and you wish you'd done something else instead.

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Personally I love it when people who are not my doctor offer me specific, actionable medical advice. Especially so when it entails surgery to permanently remove my body parts

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago

Fair, edited to bring the final choice back to podiatrist.

[-] bluespin@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Also anecodtal: I had the procedure you're describing and it worked for me. Ignoring your podiatrist is bad advice

[-] doughless@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I also had that procedure where the doctor only removes the affected part of the toenail. That was over a decade ago and I've never had the issue reoccur; and I still have my toenail.

[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I've also had the same procedure before, three times (on different parts of nails, obviously) and it's worked every time.

[-] sobchak@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I had it done once when I was still a child, and the issue reoccurred. No issues for more than a decade from the ones I had as an adult though.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

On the flip side, I had partial nail removal on two toes each side, and haven't had any issues in 20 years. Procedure was quick, mostly painless, and the relief was immediate. I was playing soccer 3 days later.

If you want to ask about a full removal, go for it, but be open to professional advice.

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Oh, if you add phenol the nail won't grow out again?

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah the science is above my head but I believe usually after they rip out the nail (be it whole nail or a strip), they will apply a cotton ball of phenol to the bed and that is supposed to stop the nail from coming back. It failed to do so 3 times in my case, albeit on two different toes.

[-] SoleInvictus 1 points 1 day ago

It's chemical cauterization. The phenol kills the cells responsible for growing new nail.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
681 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16232 readers
3459 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS