552
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago

but but but guys, Kamala Harris had a weird laugh….

/s

[-] jcb2016@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

And the emails.. Bondi will make sure it gets done!

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

That was never the criticism from anyone actually opposing Trump. The criticism is that she built her career as a cop, locking people up for minor offenses, fighting to keep them in prison for cheap labor, and then went on to campaign for the most lethal military machine on Earth. But sure, go ahead and whitewash her record because it’s easier to joke than to confront the fact that your “lesser evil” still has blood on her hands.

[-] ebolapie@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

If you didn't turn out to vote you didn't oppose trump.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I said criticism, you think no one who opposed Trump should have criticised former cop who built her career on locking people up?

ACAB, just not one of the worst kind?

She was an attorney working for the executive branch, not a cop. Applying for a job higher up in the executive branch. If we are going to call everyone who executes the laws bastards, then you can't vote for anybody to join the executive branch, as you are willingly choosing to make them a bastard apparently.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Just so everyone is on the same page, to you the slogan All Cops Are Bastards applies not to all corrupt people in the legal system that abuse us and imprison us, but it's exclusively police officers?

Just checking.

Downvote and run away.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

At least she isn't nazi, traitor, piece of shit like Trump.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

She absolutely is a Nazi. A nice Nazi that supported genocide.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 5 days ago

Liberals have supported plenty of genocides.

As have socialists.

[-] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 days ago

I only really saw those criticisms of her from people already on the left. What I saw (in generalized and slightly exaggerated manner) from conservatives was, "NO, SHE'S A LIBERAL, WOKE, COMMUNIST WHO WANTS TO DESTROY AMERICA!"

To which most people I saw on the left respond with, "Communist? The former cop and DA?"

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

That's literally what I'm saying.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

That was never the criticism from anyone actually opposing Trump.

Yes it was. It was a dumb and invalid argument, but it came up more often than it ever should have. It was an EXCUSE to not vote for her, because it was easier to say that than to admit that they’re just afraid of a woman in power.

I realize there were many more valid reasons to dislike her but compared to trump, she’s a goddamn saint. Plus, I liked her VP pick better than trump’s. She also would have selected a much more competent and qualified cabinet.

The criticism is that she built her career as a cop, locking people up for minor offenses, fighting to keep them in prison for cheap labor, and then went on to campaign for the most lethal military machine on Earth.

Those are all valid criticisms, but trump built his career as a criminal, is deporting people for minor offenses, fighting to deport innocent people to prison labor camps in countries they are not even from, and then went on to campaign for the most lethal military machine on Earth.

So comparing the two with just those criticisms, it’s a wash. And then adding on all the other AWFUL shit trump is doing, especially “project 2025,” it’s no contest.

But sure, go ahead and whitewash her record because it’s easier to joke than to confront the fact that your “lesser evil” still has blood on her hands.

I’m not whitewashing anything, I made a sarcastic comment mocking the misogynists who have put a LITERAL AUTHORITARIAN MADMAN in the presidency because they couldn’t handle a woman president.

When our choices are : lesser evil or absolute evil (and the third choice is: just let absolute evil win), we really can’t let petty things like “annoying laugh” (again- just a lame excuse for misogyny) go.

I was accused of having “blood in my hands” for voting for Harris. But really, protest voting against Harris is drenching yourself in that same blood plus gallons more.

[-] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

This is untrue.

[-] MrErr@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

We had a bad choice and a worse choice. So i said let it all fall.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 10 points 5 days ago

We had a bad choice and a worse choice. So i said ~~let it all fall.~~ I'm a sociopath that's fine with seeing minorities being brutalized and killed so long as I can maintain some kind of bullshit ideological purity.

FTFY

[-] Narauko@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Now I voted (not that it would have mattered as Kamala was going to win my state regardless), but for the sake of argument I also didn't see minorities NOT being brutalized and killed under Biden or Obama. Or Clinton for that matter.

[-] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 days ago

At least with the bad choice more people would have energy and resources to fight back in more meaningful ways.

[-] III@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Worse option is exiling American citizens, tanking the economy, persecuting minorities, taking away rights, ignoring the constitution and, notably, full backing genocide in Gaza.

Bad option would not act to stop genocide in Gaza.

Clearly the same thing.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 5 days ago

Worse option is exiling American citizens, tanking the economy, persecuting minorities, taking away rights, ignoring the constitution and, notably, full backing genocide in Gaza.

I saw all of these things happen under the past few "bad options".

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

So i said let it all fall.

At lest vote 3rf party.

Otherwise the material reality is that you got out the way for the worse choice. Obstruction isn't ideal, but its helpful none the less

[-] piefood@feddit.online 2 points 5 days ago

I think you dropped this:

  • supported genocide
  • supported an unpopular president
  • ran on unpopular policies
  • let the voters know that she didn't care about what they wanted
  • wanted to keep the US military the "most lethal fighting force" despite the fact that we use them to kill innocent people
  • gaslit the voters on the economy

Is Trump still worse? yes, absolutely. But maybe the Democrats could try running candidates that aren't obviously terrible if they want to win.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
552 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25260 readers
1944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS