705
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Voters approved sick leave mandate by 58%, but lawmakers are caving to lobbying by the state’s chamber of commerce

Being sick is a costly business for Bill Thompson, who worked in the fast-food industry in Independence, Missouri, for more than 30 years, and recently worked at Guitar Center until early July, when he was laid off as.

“As an older worker, I have health issues from working on my feet and with my hands for many years with no breaks for eight to 10 hours a day. I have done it for 38 years now, living paycheck to paycheck,” 54-year-old Thompson said, noting in Missouri, workers are not mandated breaks of any kind during work.

So when Republicans in Missouri repealed a paid sick leave mandate that the state’s voters approved by 58% after an aggressive lobbying campaign by the Missouri chamber of commerce and industry and other business industry groups, he said, “It was a literal gut punch.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 148 points 2 days ago

Even on a day where Missourians sort of overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump, Josh Hawley and Governor Kehoe, they also overwhelmingly voted for an increase in paid sick days.

So they elected candidates who historically have opposed labor protections and government benefits, and then expected to get paid sick leave?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 76 points 2 days ago

Fox news tells them the GOP are pro-worker and the Democrats actually hate America and workers.

It's infuriating :/

[-] fishy@lemmy.today 91 points 2 days ago

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me for three decades straight and I'm the average Republican.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Yeah but I pray to the photo of Reagan on my wall every night that if I keep my mouth open and look up then the wealth will ~~piss~~ trickle down from the rich as they get richer

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I'm a school bus driver and our shop is union (Teamsters). My coworkers rabidly support our union, but are opposed to all other unions (except police unions of course) including even the teachers' union in our district. They're also mostly MAGA. They're just so fucking clueless about their own self-interest, leaving aside their utter selfishness. Our dispatcher is a lesbian who proudly talks about her wife, and she's the most rabid trumper of them all. I had one painful conversation with her where she insisted that it's the GOP that brought about same-sex marriage.

[-] prole 2 points 1 day ago

she insisted that it's the GOP that brought about same-sex marriage

Well she's about to find out the hard way how wrong this is as the Supreme Court is about to (probably) overturn Obergefell

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

And thomas will gleefully vote to overturn obergfell

[-] Azal@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago

KC here... I'm frankly fucking AMAZED we're still not a "Right to Work" state... for how quickly everything else has been overturned blatantly I'm amazed Gov Heehaw didn't find a way to gut it on the way out.

[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 23 points 2 days ago

There's a lot of lead pipes here still. And massive swaths of empty land that votes against anyone that might try to maintain or replace them via the necessary step of raising taxes.

Kansas city and St Louis didn't vote for Republicans. Unfortunately both blue patches aren't quite half the States population. But were close enough that there governor is looking to take away our representation.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 9 points 2 days ago

blue patches aren’t quite half the States population

Before gerrymandering

[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 11 points 2 days ago

Yep, Kansas city is sliced through the center like a pie. St Louis is a different kind of gerrymandered as well.

[-] prole 12 points 2 days ago

It's absolutely maddening, and it's been happening for at least 30 years

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So they elected candidates who historically have opposed labor protections and government benefits

In the USA, all candidates oppose labor protections and government benefits; it's not as if the Democrats provide relief.

(min. wage 7.25, no sick leave, no maternity leave, no vacation, fire at will, no union protections, unions down to 10% (from 40% in 70s))

Both parties are not the same, but they are both pro-corporate and anti-labor

[-] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Minimum wage

Democrats have consistently advocated for its increase. Including a proposal to raise it to $15/hour in the 2024 platform.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/10/07/can-harris-stop-blue-collar-workers-from-defecting-to-donald-trump?

Paid medical/family leave

This seems to be mostly determined by states. Several have mandated times. Plus, the Democrats push FAMILY act, which would federally require 12 paid weeks.

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was passed in 2022 - requiring better accommodations for pregnant women.

Unions

Democrats push the Protecting the Right to Organize Act - aims to expand collective bargaining rights and strengthen penalties for labor violations.

Executive actions under Biden:
Repealed Trump-era EOs that weakened collective bargaining

    Raised the pay floor for federal workers to $15/hour

    Appointed pro-union guy to the labor relations board

Pay equity

Passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in 2009 and the Paycheck Fairness Act - both attempting more equality in pay.

Trying to equate the Republicans and Democrats on these issues is absolutely asinine, completely indefensible and based on sheer ignorance. People like you, too lazy to do the slightest research and subsisting on lazy assumptions and memes, are why a convicted pedophile is currently the president.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Democrats have consistently advocated for its increase. Including a proposal to raise it to $15/hour in the 2024 platform.

Yes, they advocate for many things that they will not do. Biden had a majority for two years, proposed it, a few Democrats voted against, and that's that. Did they try to at least raise it a little, say to nine an hour? No, why bother? It's always a few Democrats; Super PACs don't have to pay everybody. Just enough.

This seems to be mostly determined by states. Several have mandated times. Plus, the Democrats push FAMILY act, which would federally require 12 paid weeks. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was passed in 2022 - requiring better accommodations for pregnant women.

That's neat, but did you know that we are surpassed by the entire first world with worker benefits, and now even eastern Europe? That's pro-labor? No. No, it is not. If Poland increases their minimum wage another dollar, they will surpass the USAs "labor party" in results in every way.

Democrats push the Protecting the Right to Organize Act - aims to expand collective bargaining rights and strengthen penalties for labor violations. Executive actions under Biden: Repealed Trump-era EOs that weakened collective bargaining

Union membership has fallen down to 10%, from 40% in the 1970s. Union membership does not rise under D administrations, that's a fact.

Trying to equate the Republicans and Democrats on these issues is absolutely asinine

They are both pro-business and anti-labor, and anyone who disagrees (specifically you) should be under supervised care and hidden from the public. Japan, Australia, Canada, South Korea, United Kingdom, Western and Eastern Europe all prove that you are wrong. They have real labor parties, not the shallow mockery of one we have in the USA.

completely indefensible and based on sheer ignorance.

Only a dimwitted ignoramus would think that the Democrats are "pro-labor" when compared to the rest of civilization as we know it. You bring shame to yourself and your family

People like you, too lazy to do the slightest research and subsisting on lazy assumptions and memes, are why a convicted pedophile is currently the president.

People like you will always lick the boot, because you're fine with union membership and pay dropping every year, immune to the suffering of labor all around you in spite of mountains of evidence to the contrary, and eager to believe that things are different than they really are. They should take away your driver's license.

[-] prole 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The Democratic party is, but at the local and state levels, there absolutely are progressive, pro-labor Democrats. Whereas all Republicans right now are fascists (the few non-fascists left or were forced out).

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, local and state is filled with decent progressive Democrats, also socialists, libertarians, green party, and more.

Federal? One pro-labor Democrat has been allowed to take office, yay.... and she agrees with me (that Democrats have abandoned labor).

Leadership "allows" them to exist, after all you can't just load them all into work camps. Yet.

[-] prole 2 points 1 day ago

Federal? One pro-labor Democrat has been allowed to take office

There's more than one in the House and Senate. But yes, can probably count them on two hands.

[-] FalseTautology@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a lot of people got exactly what they deserve

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
705 points (100.0% liked)

News

31592 readers
2714 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS