926
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
926 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
73758 readers
3423 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Amazon have how many data centers and they wanna be building more? Greedy cunts
We could simply stop using amazon services and they won't be build anymore.
Good luck using the internet while avoiding AWS
I swear I didn’t asked for this bloated fucking mess. The whole internet could’ve been optimized to 10% of whatever it is today but we’re trying to run ReactJS now in the backend instead.
This comment needs to load after a paywall, 2 ads to subscribe, and some auto play videos.
I have VPS’s in Quebec, running on mostly hydroelectric power, in a place without water supply concerns for locals, in a cooler climate. OVH in this case, but there are others. Can’t control what random websites are hosted on, but can avoid giving money to this crazyness.
Yup, just takes a single person!
Clearly I need to pull myself up by my bootstraps and checks notes change how large portions of the Internet get their compute.
I'm gonna use up all the fresh water just popping down to the data center for some AWS compute time, as a treat.
I haven't given a god damn dime to amazon since 2020, ever since I learned about the piss bottles. I've asked (and assisted) others to do the same. What else do you expect someone to do? Speak for yourself asshole.
Are you familiar with AWS? Amazon Web services. Many, many, websites use them and I don't think there's a way to tell as a user.
Like, you go to a website and their images are hosted on s3 (an aws service) and their database is on RDS (also AWS), and their whole backend application is using eks or ecs or whatever.
That's extremely common. Companies don't run their own hardware anymore very often.
I never understood the popularity of AWS. It's much cheaper using VPSs and even dedicated servers sometimes. I've worked on very cost-sensitive projects where I rolled our own highly-available k8s and postgres clusters on dedicated servers and VPSs and saved the company a shit load of money. Only used the "cloud" to store backups (Backblaze). There's tons of other options other than major "cloud" providers, and they're often much cheaper.
I know. I'm not a web dev nor do I know anyone who is to convince otherwise, to use other services. AWS dominance is undeniably huge. If you know a way to combat that (alternative infrastructure) I would be happy to hear it, and I will share that alongside what I already tell people. Again I'm not well-versed in that space, but my understanding is that AWS is essentially the only full-stack solution that's also highly scalable. Open to correction if I'm wrong here.
Google and Microsoft have competing services, but those companies also suck. I think they're less popular, but I don't know much about why.
I'm not aware of any smaller competitors, though some probably exist. It would be a big risk for a company to go with a new provider. There's a lot of library support for the big players, for one thing. If you want your python application to talk to AWS, the boto library is just right there.
You could run your own hardware somewhere, but that has its own host of problems, if you'll pardon the pun. I worked somewhere a long time ago that had its own servers in a data center. The place got flooded in a big storm and we were down for a couple days.
Agreed, MS and Google are pretty much on the same plane with regards to company ethics.
Makes sense that it becomes a serious trade-off with usability the more a company tries to DIY. The risk aspect is certainly hard to get around. Seems that a solution to this problem would have to be long-term. Any company that has competed with AWS in the past, afaik, has been purchased and absorbed. It would likely require the creation of a nonprofit with a guiding directive to prioritize keeping the organization independent and never being sold. But I've seen that sort of thing fall apart and go off-mission in other industries too.
Considering the above, the only other thing I can think of is a regulating body declaring AWS as a monopoly and forcing them to split. The chances of that happening in the current administration are probably near zero.
Shit sucks, though I appreciate your response.
I mean water isn't that important
Ah yes, just stop using the internet.