841
Abandon Ship! (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 week ago by not_IO to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Windows has been malware since ~~the vista days~~ it came out because of the DRM

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago

Unpopular opinion: Windows peaked with Vista.

Vista had its troubles, but that was mostly due to drivers, which aren’t 100% on Microsoft. There was also performance issues, but I think some of that was due to underpowered hardware…

Once the Service Packs came out and the drivers matured, vista was stable, easy to use, and introduced a bunch of good features.

Everything past vista has been stupid and non sensical. They constantly change things, then have to roll back.

I have to use windows 11 at work, it’s terrible with weird bugs and performance issues. The funniest thing is my work issued me a high powered surface branded laptop.

Microsoft can’t even blame the issues on any other vendor, it’s a 1st party device, windows should be the best on surface devices. Especially given they have been making them for years and years

[-] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago

Windows 7 was up-to-date Vista with a new start menu and a different name and people absolutely loved it from the start.

[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Vista era was when they were working on new driver models, graphics APIs, filesystem, a new shell, etc.

Sure most of them ended up sucking or didn't ship at all, but at least they were trying to improve the core of the OS.

Since then it's been 100% driven by marketing and adbusing their users.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Peaked with xp imo

[-] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Windows 3.1 was fine and fast. They should have stopped there.

[-] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Progman.exe for the win

[-] original_reader@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

3.1 looked terrible.

2000 was stable and looked decent for it's time. Enjoyed the look of 10, but behind the scenes it was invasive. 11 is terrible on the looks* and the invasiveness.

*) seriously... it looks dated and cluttered after using something like Gnome for a while

[-] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

Can someone write a 64 bit Windows for Workgroups 3.11?

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 6 days ago
[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Is this any good? Looks pretty neat for helping people switch

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 5 days ago

Its been in alpha since the 90s and can't run anything past vista last I checked. For most mint with wine is probably still ideal. I was just being silly and giving a genuine reply

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Oh I see.Yeah, it looks a little jank lol.mint has run all my windows programs, fine

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
841 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8730 readers
2029 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS