883
me_irl (discuss.online)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

Says who? Is the whole point of movies not for you to have fun?

[-] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago

In the same sense the point of food is to get you full. There's more nuance to it.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That's why I find myself staring at a half eaten jar of green olives or an empty sleeve of crackers during the wee hours. Sometimes we just want to get to the point and not bother with the journey.

[-] SeekPie 11 points 1 year ago
[-] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, but if I enjoyed eating the food it was good food.

[-] 9bananas@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago

junk food is still junk food, even if you enjoyed it.

that was the point of the comparison in the previous comment.

the nutritional quality of food has little to do with your enjoyment of it.

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Great analogy. I'm going to use this next time someone tells me I should just ignore the shitty writing in self published books and have fun reading it.

Fuck you, I paid money for this, I get to bitch about why it sucks.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 35 points 1 year ago

Children of Men, good movie, not fun

[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Also Pig, too autheur for me, not fun, but i still like it.

[-] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What makes it good to you?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Some movies are intentionally not fun, because their message isn't about fun things.

Leaving Las Vegas isn't fun.

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 18 points 1 year ago

Evolution (2001) is an objectively bad movie.

It is also one of my all time favorites because it's fun and doesn't take itself too seriously.

Schindler's List is an objectively good movie. It is decidedly not fun.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yo, I completely forgot about Evolution! Definitely putting that on the rewatch list.

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Nah movies are ranked on a set of objective criteria such variety and use of color, the use of varied angles, runtime:budget ratio, and so on. Technically speaking the best movies are usually produced by accidentally dropping a cellphone from a hot air balloon

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 1 year ago

I think you should read my previous comment again.

One can have fun watching a bad movie. One can have no fun watching a good movie.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

One can have no fun watching a good movie

Requiem for a Dream

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago
[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I had a lot of fun watching that. I played a drinking game where every time he took a drink, so did I.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 1 year ago

How are you posting if you're dead?

[-] NecroParagon@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Such a perfect example. I had the opposite of fun watching that the first time but it's still one of my favorite movies.

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Dancer in the Dark

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Schindler's List is not a fun movie.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Imo if it's fun then it's good, but being fun isn't the only path to "goodness". Lots of good movies out there that are the opposite of fun

[-] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No idea why you’re getting downvoted. Did all the lemmings forget how to experience joy? If you like the art, it’s good art. That’s the whole point.

[-] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Dancer in the Dark

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
883 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

7962 readers
1632 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS