344
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
344 points (100.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
2915 readers
897 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I've seen a lot of posts on Lemmy today arguing that Greta Thunberg is privileged, self-obsessed or self-promoting, that her actions are merely symbolic and useless, etc. I have to wonder whether these are part of a coordinated campaign. I hope we can all recognize someone who cares enough to put themselves in danger for the sake of others.
Greta literally risked her life for this. Israel killed ten people on the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla. And Israel bombed the most recent one.
The comments about Greta doing this for self promotion are pure Zionist bots. It is the de-facto Zionist retort after illegally kidnapping Greta in international waters. And the statement has very clearly been communicated from the top down at the Israeli Hasbara department.
It's a good opportunity to block bots, trolls, centrists and bootlickers though
I take my time to request they explain their entire "argument" until they are so frustrated with their own inaccuracies they decide to stop commenting. Just had some fun with that yesterday. Make it clear to those who come after.
Don't feed trolls, please.
Yeah, centrists hate anyone that makes their genocide look bad.
I don’t wonder at all.
I can’t remember the exact quote from Herman Hesse but it’s something like, “A person cannot conceive a quality in another that they don’t also have within themselves.” The reason so many people question Greta’s motives is because they are inherently selfish and Greta’s altruism is impossible for them to understand. The only reason they’d do anything that appears to be heroic is for their own ego or self serving means.
Yes, this also explains why right-wingers always accuse others of "virtue signalling" when they try to do something helpful.
Gotta love that projection
Sone of us are older and take issue with how much attention she is drawing while not really organizing anything. She's a useful figurehead but there are people making her out to be akin to the American civil rights leaders of the past and she's not doing what they did in terms of grassroots organization. She's more Oprah, without the baggage she brings, than MLK.
She's neither the second coming of Christ nor is she a huckster. I think she's a sometimes media darling who does work herself but does not seem to be building a movement but rather shows up to be the face of it.
Considerable funds have been spent to make you reach that conclusion, and think it's accurate.
Huh? She's done nothing but organize grassroot movements and civil disobedience since she was 15? MLK was 28 when he helped form the SCLC, Greta is 22 - give her some credit.
Not organizing anything? She was just kidnapped for being part of organizing an aide flotilla to a war zone. The fuck are you even talking about?
No, you don't understand, she didn't do it the exact perfect way that I want her to do it (yet refuse to explain to anyone for some reason)
Of course! I get it now! And even if she did do things perfectly, there were other people also doing things, she didn’t do it all by herself, so fuck her.
I'm really interested to know more about how she's like Oprah. Can you expand more on that?
"I just dun' like 'er"-ass kind of comment.
Some of you have issues with her message, but have to pretend to dislike the delivery.
Personally I don’t feel one can argue that she isn’t doing good but I do feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about it can do more harm than good and even border on immature. Especially given that the people who most need to hear her message are those who are most likely to ignore her due to her age and station.
What has she done that you believe is immature?
I didn’t say I believe she is immature. I said I feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about doing things can do more harm than good and border on immature.
Can you provide an example, even a hyperbole, that would support this stance?
https://sh.itjust.works/comment/19134994
The “both sides” argument is an argument for only one side. You’re just a coward.
And an example of that would be?
Don’t carry water for concern trolls.
There is no opposition to genocide that you won't find fault with.