344
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
344 points (100.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
3062 readers
1227 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Personally I don’t feel one can argue that she isn’t doing good but I do feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about it can do more harm than good and even border on immature. Especially given that the people who most need to hear her message are those who are most likely to ignore her due to her age and station.
What has she done that you believe is immature?
I didn’t say I believe she is immature. I said I feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about doing things can do more harm than good and border on immature.
Can you provide an example, even a hyperbole, that would support this stance?
https://sh.itjust.works/comment/19134994
The “both sides” argument is an argument for only one side. You’re just a coward.
Again, I don’t think you actually read my comment. I literally said what she is doing is good and I don’t think people can argue against that but that I understood why people are pissed about how she is going about it. But if I you think I am a coward for speaking my mind then you need to rethink your priorities.
You’re not a coward for speaking your mind, you’re a coward for not taking a stance. You’re doing nothing and complaining about others doing something.
Get fucked.
I did take a stance. You just can’t read or automatically disagree with anything that doesn’t fit your worldview.
Only pro israel and people who believe that climatic change is a hoax thst hate her
Just sounds like hedging to me.
And an example of that would be?
I dont feel like you are reading what I am saying. I can see both sides. I’m not arguing for either one.
You claim that you "feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about doing things can do more harm than good and border on immature."
I'm asking for what the evidence supporting immaturity would be in that argument.
I am really not getting what is so hard to understand about what I said or why people in this thread really want to fight about it but I guess I’ll say it again;
I can see why people are pissed about how she goes about spreading an otherwise good message and I am willing to listen to them. I am not arguing either side.
And people are simply asking you to provide an example of why people might be pissed. Since you said you understand why.
You refuse to do it.
Of course I refuse. Why would I engage with people who don’t get that I was responding to someone who was discounting others’ opinions because they disagree with them and then everyone did that to me?
Sure. You're just badmouthing one side and not the other.
I can understand what you're saying, but one side is irredeemably evil and the other wants the evil to stop. Equivocating between the two is support for the former.
Don’t carry water for concern trolls.
There is no opposition to genocide that you won't find fault with.