780

Biden's office announced his illness Sunday afternoon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 115 points 6 days ago

It’s likely that they knew a long time ago but they are just now announcing it. This would probably also explain why he was so mentally foggy or, seeming like he had dementia. Many cancer drug drugs can do that toyou.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 79 points 6 days ago

If that's the case he was even more wrong about running than everyone assumed.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 88 points 6 days ago

Somebody had to step up and save us from Bernie Sanders

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 26 points 6 days ago
[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 37 points 6 days ago

When all the joy in life is gone, I'll take any joke that eeks just a little bit of dopamine out of my brain.

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 8 points 6 days ago

… yeah, I feel that bud.

[-] dzso@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I'd assume that played a huge role in him choosing to step down.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 6 days ago

So glad he wanted to run for a second term then, especially after promising to be a one term president. /sarcasm

[-] TotallynotJessica 4 points 6 days ago

He never promised. We lost when he won the 2020 primary

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I mean, Biden is quoted as calling it a campaign promise.

Which is is less binding than a pinky promise, but in 2024, he at least saw that he had made the commitment in 2020. Plenty of people in 2024 then were also incorrectly saying that Biden didn't make that promise.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

I remember the promise and I also remember thinking "why the fuck are you even running if you won't for a second term"

[-] TotallynotJessica 4 points 5 days ago

Exactly; it was always a lie that couldn't be taken seriously

[-] Honytawk@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

Compared to Trump winning? Which was the only viable other option during that term.

[-] TotallynotJessica 4 points 5 days ago

Viable!?! Given Biden only really won because of Covid, I think Bernie would've actually had a shot in the general, especially in energizing the base and working class. Warren could've also stood a better chance, even if she might not have done as great of a job in office.

Biden was the worst choice, I thought Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and especially Harris in 2020 were far better, but the capitalist elites wanted a weak old man, so we got Biden, dooming us for 2024 because there was no way he'd be selfless enough to step aside. He might've said he'd be one term, but he was lying and that's why no one took him seriously.

[-] Gismonda@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago

This was exactly my first thought.

And if so, that’s a double “fuck you” to Joe and everyone on his staff trying to keep this shit under wraps.

He should have just resigned the goddamn Presidency when he was first diagnosed JFC

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 16 points 6 days ago

Yeah if he was incapacitated because of drugs he should have let Kamala take over.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

he had covid, at that time too.

this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
780 points (100.0% liked)

News

29506 readers
1822 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS