1403
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://poptalk.scrubbles.tech/post/2333639

I was just forwarded this someone in my household who watches our server. That's it folks. I've been a hold out for a long time, but this is honestly it.

They want me to pay to stream content that I bought from my hardware transcoded also on my hardware.

I'll say it. As of today, I say Plex is dead. Luckily I've been setting up Jellyfin, I guess it's time to make it production ready.

Edit: I have a Plex Pass. More comments saying “Just buy a plex pass” are seriously not getting it. I have a Plex Pass and my users are still getting this.

And for the thousandth person who wants to say the same things to me:

  • YES I know I'm unaffected as a Plex Pass owner.
  • My users were immediately angry at it, which made me angry. Our users don't understand what plex pass is, and they shouldn't have to, that's why I had it. The fact that they were pinged even though it should have kept working is horribly sloppy
  • Plex is still removing functionality. I don't care that "People should pay their fair share". If Plex wants to put every new feature behind a paywall, that's completely okay. They are removing functionality.
    • "But they have cloud costs". Remote streaming is negligible to them. It's a dynamic DNS service. Plex client logs in, asks where server is, plex cloud responds with the IP and port of where server is located. That's it.
    • "Good luck finding another remote streaming" - Again, Plex just opens up an IP and port. Jellyfin also just opens up an IP and port (Hold on jellyfin folks I know, security, that's a separate conversation). All "remote streaming" is is their dynamic dns. Literal pennies to them. Know what actually is costing them money? Hosting all of that ad-supported "free" content that they're probably losing money on.

In short, I don't care how you justify it. Plex is doing something shitty. They're removing functionality that has been free for years. I'm not responding to any more of your comments repeating the same arguments over and over.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 30p87@feddit.org 219 points 2 days ago

I never got the idea of selfhosting but paying (except for enterprise-grade support or donations) anyway.

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 179 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You know all the certs and security and port stuff you need to do? Plex does that. You just download the app, point it at your folders with media, and you’re all set both at your home and beyond it. There is no self hosted solution that is that turnkey. I really don’t understand how so many people don’t see the appeal of that. It makes quasi-selfhosting possible for people with far less technical knowledge than those of us here.

I could write a less than one page bullet point instruction and virtually anyone who knows how to work a desktop computer could get a server up and running in one or two hours tops. If they have any computer experience, more like 30 minutes.

What’s more, people with literally no computer knowledge can easily open the app and watch your stuff. They just make an account, download the app, and they’re off to the races. TV, tablet, doesn’t matter. There is no self hosted solution that is nearly as streamlined as Plex. I say this as somebody who likes jellyfin a lot. They are completely different experiences that require completely different levels of knowledge

[-] LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee 36 points 2 days ago

I run into you again! This time I get to wholeheartedly agree with you! You are spot on and nailed it.

I use Plex for exactly the reasons you said because when I set it up I didn’t know anything about self hosting a media server and I wanted to share with family in other locations. I keep it because it’s so easy for my older, less tech savvy family members to access so I don’t have to be their support person for it.

I’d consider Jellyfin if the end user access was more plug and play.

The biggest thing about this is I don’t get why OP is so annoyed. If you have a Plex Pass you’re not impacted, you can still share and your users can still access your library for free, they can’t share with you without a Plex Pass but who cares.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 21 points 2 days ago

I’d consider Jellyfin if the end user access was more plug and play.

It's about as plug and play as any other website. They just open the app, type in the URL, and log in with their credentials and...that's it.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

After setting up an elaborate VPN scheme

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SMillerNL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

What about combining sources? Because in plex I can search all libraries. Mine or external.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SoleInvictus 13 points 2 days ago

I LOVE Jellyfin but can only imagine the amount of work I'd have to do if I tried to get my parents and in-laws successfully using it. We all just split the cost of lifetime Plex pass the last time it was on sale.

[-] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

can only imagine the amount of work I'd have to do

Insert url. Insert login credentials.

[-] SoleInvictus 8 points 2 days ago

I see you know as much about Jellyfin as you do about my in-laws.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm sure he doesn't know your family as well as you do, but as for jellyfin, that's exactly what you do, open it in a browser and stream, I don't understand what's your objection to that

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

The giant unsecured barn door that is the Jellyfin backend

[-] SoleInvictus 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

@MaggiWuerze@feddit.org nailed it. Jellyfin has security issues. It's better than it used to be, but it's still bad.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago
[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Do you mean the Facebook thing? I tried to Google the internet from the Facebooks and it didn't work. I called Comcast and I told them the problem and now I have 400 TV channels. They took your computer box, said it was bad for security. Something about shredding it. Anyway, can you get the internet to Google for me?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You know all the certs and security and port stuff you need to do? Plex does that. You just download the app, point it at your folders with media, and you’re all set both at your home and beyond it.

I am just gonna read your comment until here, Plex does shit if you are CGNATED, and as it is 2025 I suppose most users are, I still needed to expose through IPv6 with a reverse proxy, using a VPS or a VPN to access my Plex Server, so yeah, Plex hasn't helped me at all since many years ago with the noob friendly approach they have.

EDIT: Oh and their relay feature is garbage, even for Plex Pass users, and I happen to be a lifetime one.

[-] semperverus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Any time you rely on another company to handle your data, you are beholden to their whims, end of story. Don't like what they're doing? Too bad. Give up the convenience and host it yourself, or continue to be a slave to their corporate interests.

[-] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Turns out some of us make compromises and you’re just going to have to get over that.

You use no services that have some info on you? Not one subscription service? Not one social media account? Nothing Google or Apple or Microsoft?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago

For a good while, Plex was the only game in town that did the job well, and they put the transcoding feature behind the paywall.

Given it wasn't that expensive for a lifetime pass a number of years ago (I remember it was cheaper than a game anyway) and they still seemed relatively user-centric at the time, many people like me felt like they were supporting developers building something that was useful to us.

I still run my Plex server since it's not really costing me not to, but I've been running Jellyfin too for a little while and it more or less can do the same job these days

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 20 points 2 days ago

Yup, for the time it was worth it. I got about 7 years out of my "lifetime" plex pass, and I got it on sale. All in all, I won't say the money was wasted.

It's 100% a waste if anyone pays for that BS monthly streaming fee though.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 10 points 2 days ago

Wait so you've got a lifetime plex pass already? Then literally nothing changes for you or anyone that is streaming from your server.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lyra_Lycan 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I put my chips (£100) on Emby.

I haven't regretted my purchase. I can't sell anyone on much either, because Emby does all the same as other services, except they've kept adding features while Plex kept doing the Google thing and taking them away. CPU transcoding is free I believe, as is remote streaming up to 10 devices for each user.. Idk I paid pretty early on, but lifetime license is where it's at. Subscriptions just open your asshole for greedy CEOs to fuck you. Best to keep subscriptions voluntary, like donating on Github or Patreon

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

Emby was borne out of classic workplace toxicity, in that Jellyfin was becoming too corporate so a couple devs forked off to keep it clean.

I think you have that backwards. Jellyfin is a fork of emby

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah; Emby was originally called MediaBrowser and was a free open source project. 'MediaBrowsers' developers decided to move to a closed source paid model to establish some more consistent income and support the dedicated developers they have. Thus Emby was born.

Some users were really unhappy with this decision and forked MediaBrowsers last release to create Jellyfin. Their development has been quite a bit slower, but they've made some significant strides in recent years. It's a more and more attractive option.

One of my biggest reasons for sticking with Emby (besides already having a lifetime premier license) is the dedicated clients available on more platforms. Xbone is my primary streaming device, besides android: Emby has a dedicated xbox client you can install that will take full advantage of the the hardware(more content direct plays, HEVC video for example), where as Jellyfin you've gotta use the web browser which is cumbersome and forces the server to transcode media a lot more.

[-] Lyra_Lycan 2 points 1 day ago

Indeed I did, I removed my speculative comments..

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago

In the case of plex, it's not 100% selfhosted. There's a dependence on plexs public infrastructure for user management/authentication. They also help bypass NAT by proxying connections through their servers so you don't have to setup port forwarding and can even easily escape double NAT situations.

I can understand paying for that convenience, but cost keeps rising while previously free features continue to get locked behind paywalls.

Tbh, having users required to authenticate with plex.tv was enough for me to look elsewhere. The biggest reason to self host for me is to remove dependency on public services.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago

The central user management is not a feature, it’s a hook to force people to pay for self-hosted software.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Can't say I disagree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] b3an@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When they monitor what you watch and who you share it with, it’s enshittified. Fuck Plex. I used to be a lifetime drum thumper. Stopped a few years ago.

Plex doesn’t care about you, your comfort, ease. It wants your money and it wants to monitor and control what you do with your own data.

Fuck. That.

[-] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

With Plex, you're getting the easy ability to grant access to users. You get a single pane that can search across multiple Plex instances, and NAT traversal/port forwarding. Jellyfin makes you figure that out yourself.

[-] NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

It's not exactly difficult if you use Tailscale or really any VPN. So I really don't see the value for the cost; if you're even considering self hosting a Plex server/instance, there's a list of basic knowledge you should have or learn (like what you mentioned).

[-] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its not difficult for technical people like you or me, but my friend who just wants to watch their favorite show on my Plex on their TV won't know how to traffic engineer the traffic over a Tailscale network to my network. My mom won't be installing Tailscale on her laptop and phone.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I'm also not particularly happy with giving a bunch of people VPB access to my setup. Or other potential complications that come with that setup.

I know enough to be able to lock it down, but I dont want the hassle. And other people will want it less.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Take HomeAssistant for example: you’re free to use it self-hosted, but as soon as you want to expose it securely through the Internet, there’s need for infrastructure that has costs, both in materials and labor. In HomeAssistant’s case, it’s NabuCasa that does it, and costs money, and helps fund the work of HomeAssistant’s developers.

Having things free (libre) and open source is a blessing, but we have become used, entitled, even spoiled, to enjoy the work of very specialized people for free. That’s not always feasible.

Another example, Zabbix, is totally open source and free, they only charge for support and training if you ask for them. It has worked for them for many years, but if they start to struggle with funding, I’d understand if they charged for it.

[-] techwithjake@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Home Assistant doesn't require to pay for anything at any point in time for any reason. If you want to expose your instance to the web, they have all the documents on how to do it yourself. There's absolutely nothing "hidden" behind a paywall. The only reason to say is if you want Nabu Casa to handle exposing your instance to the internet and various cloud services like Google Assistant/Alexa. The reason to pay Nabu Casa is if you don't have the technical know how (or lazy like me) and to help fund Home Assistant (which I want).

That's all to say that Plex and Home Assistant are not similar in their pay scheme. It'd be more akin if Jellyfin started charging users to allow a one click way to stream outside the home with no obligation to.

this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
1403 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

46596 readers
1182 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS