1724
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago

You’re welcome to make your own comic if you think you can do better.

[-] dota__2@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

now now. that's just a stupid stance to take. you don't have to make media to be critical of it.

or do you have to make a podcast to say joe rogan's slop is toxic, diseased, and damaging to society?

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 year ago

"This is a dog shit comic" is not a critique, though, is the thing. It's just jerking off in public.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

You’re right of course! But also there’s a big difference between real criticism and just saying something is “dogshit”. In fact you criticized Joe Rogan’s stuff properly, by drawing attention to the negative effects it has on people. We could go even further and pick out specific cases. (Though there’s no need to in this case, I agree with you.)

On the other hand, shitting on something with no reasoning just makes you a hater. I work with several comic artists professionally, and a common thing they ALL see is a nontrivial percentage of commenters who simply disparage everything. This is not because the content is inherently bad, but because all these trolls can do is destroy, not create.

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

Them saying Joe Rogan's podcast is "toxic, diseased, and damaging to society" is not better critique than the other poster calling this comic dog shit. Both are just statements that provide no argument or reasoning behind the statements. Sure they could back it up with examples why it is so, but so could the other commenter, which would make either of those comments valid criticism, but without they are equally good (or bad) criticism.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think it’s fine because we were operating on an implicit set of shared knowledge. Not every communication needs to be a research paper.

I have no understanding (implicit or explicit) of why the original commenter hated this comic, and clearly that’s the case for the vast majority of the voters here.

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Providing 2-3 lines of explanatory context is hardly a research paper, but enough to illustrate reason behind a simple statement.

AFAIK, the author of this comic is somewhat of an asshat that exercises varying degree of censorship on a comic strip subreddit, based on their personal beliefs.

[-] dota__2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

like i replied to the original comment that person is complaining about, she's had some really dumb takes but is usually in the right ballpark. those dumb takes were also cases where she doubled down and yeah, that subreddit is basically a safespace for their superusers/content creators.

[-] dota__2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] dota__2@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

there is no substantive difference between my comment about rogan and that guys comment about this comic. only your opinion is coloring how you take it.

you and every single person upvoting you are just lemmings wearing a different team's jersey than the idiot lemming above.

if anything, we need more haters at this point, because y'all dumb af.

[-] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just a cover for her... erm, alternative content.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

I find that highly unlikely. It’s far more profitable to just do NSFW if that’s your goal.

If anything the NSFW posts are a way to monetize the actual thing she wants to draw, which are normal comics.

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Exactly. The NSFW stuff came about from demand, not because she was pushing it. It ended up being very successful, so she kept doing it. It's weird how angry people get that someone would post nudes.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

So what? Are you such a prude that this insults you?

[-] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago

A woman being involved in anything NSFW is automatically labelled negatively among a certain sect of the population.

Which is such a shame because drawing a funny comic that has NSFW elements should be lauded.

Love oglaf.com

[-] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think simping for online personalities and influencers is particularly healthy, and it's one of the last things I'd defend.

It ain't about the porn, more the intent to sell porn behind the guise of a reddit comic.

Kinda like when SrGrafo was making loli art. (don't make me post it)

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It ain't about the porn, more the intent to sell porn behind the guise of a reddit comic.

That's strange, because I'm only aware of the porn because of you, not because of the comic.

You're the one advertising Internet porn here.

[-] hungryphrog 4 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
1724 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

23691 readers
1886 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS