1113
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 185 points 3 weeks ago

The fact that Kamala is even going to try to run again shows how fucked that party is.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago

The fact that's she's leading in the polls is fucking crazy

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 weeks ago

The worse the republicans screw up, the more the Democrats are convinced they don't need to change. I don't think Kamala is going to end up on the ticket. I think the democratic establishment is going to push Gavin Newsom and Rahm Emanuel or something dumb like that.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

As a Californian, please don't vote for Newsom. He has done an about face and is courting Charlie Kirk

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

The entire Democratic party consists of people like that.

[-] scintilla@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Newsom is pretty much the only person under the Dem banner I wouldn't vote for in 2028. I would enen vote for Pelosi but not fucking Newsom.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Bruh, it's a meaningless poll. There's no election coming up. Hoping and pretending isn't going to change anything. Forget any pretense of another election.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There’s no election coming up.

The spectacle of election is never going away. We literally just had two house special elections at the start of the month.

We've got some pivotal gubernatorial races in November. I'm sure we'll have more special elections as our existing crop of geriatric politicians die out. Then a bunch of legislative races in '26, etc.

The spectacle won't end. We're going to keep doing the ritual for a long while.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, mostly meaningless elections. I wouldn't even expect midterms, let alone the national.

[-] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 29 points 3 weeks ago

I know it's fucking ridiculous. She didn't get people to the polls last time against Trump... if she can't get people to vote against him she can't get people to vote at all.

[-] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Says everything.

A PROSECUTOR IS OUR LIBERAL SAVIOR?!?!?!?!

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 17 points 3 weeks ago

Guys - go and advocate AOC on other platforms.
Including GOP ones like wsj comments, rumble and others

[-] PaulBunyan@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

I’d rather Whitmer over AOC or Harris

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Neat! But your words don't mean anything because unless we fight, no election matters. So many Americans are under the impression that we can vote our way out of this. I'm sorry, sometimes a country is in turmoil and your only choices are fight or die. Nobody chooses this, but if you choose to avoid it, you're only hurting yourself and kids. Sometimes you don't have a choice but to fight.

[-] PaulBunyan@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

This summarizes current America very well: I say I prefer a different candidate and you respond by telling me I’m wrong for that.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

No, I'm saying we all prefer someone different, but sometimes we don't have a choice.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

And what are you doing to that end, aside from the obvious of typing vigorously about it?

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Don't worry about that and just know that I'm an ally.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I note you don't say who's ally you are.

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 weeks ago

Is she even doing anything? Whitmer?

[-] PaulBunyan@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. She’s been helping expand health coverage for more Michiganders, protecting all Michiganders from discrimation for housing and job employment, protected and enabled those seeking abortions, helped get major funding for horrendous roads, and always seems to be one of the first governors to protect their people when the GOP on a federal level passes anything that weakens us.

[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

I read the headline and couldn't believe it

[-] toddestan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair to Kamala, she hasn't announced that she's running in 2028. Neither has AOC for that matter. This is just some pollster polling against some names that people might have heard of.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
1113 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23508 readers
2374 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS