15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dave@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago

A hard pivot would have been going into food blenders. A launch company going into satellites seems more like just following the money.

Oh, definitely. It sounds like the CEO is pretty up front about that:

"The launch market is relatively small compared to the economic potential of satellite communication," Wrenn said. "Launch has generally been more of a cost center than a profit center. Satcom will be a much larger piece of the overall industry."

A hard pivot would have been going into food blenders.

Hey, at least blenders also spin. I suspect the choice of the word "pivot" was not an accidental one by Berger :)

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

They wouldn't have gotten the same investor money if they started with this concept, though. They got money to be SpinLaunch, so this is a pivot and a bit of a bait and switch for investors. Kind of like Relativity getting a $billion+ in investments for 3d printed rockets, then turning into Ariane.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Spaceflight

916 readers
10 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS