935
Immersion-breaking (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 86 points 3 weeks ago

As I understand it, that's still not very historically accurate. It was not really a thing for archers to nock and loose together like they do in the movies.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 121 points 3 weeks ago

Never really made sense to me, loose all the arrows at once and then give a break between volleys? Gives everyone a chance to hide behind their shield, and then advance when it's clear. Unless volleys are perfectly timed between multiple rows of archers.

Random arrows flying constantly never gives the enemy a chance to feel safe since it's a constant barrage, and there's no wasted time for the archers needing to wait for the command to fire.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 93 points 3 weeks ago

Archers were strategic weapons, not the main crux of killilng. They were used to do things like keeping an enemy division pinned down so that your cavalry can move around them or one of your own divisions can reach a more advantageous position. A well placed concentrated barrage could force an enemy to move in a direction that is more advantageous to you, etc...

They weren't the primary means of killing people. They were the means of steering the battle where the general wanted it to go.

[-] itslilith 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's an oversimplification. Skilled archers, especially in numbers, are a force to be reckoned with. For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Agincourt

Or think of horse archers. The mongols used them to great effect, and the Romans lost 7 legions against them, despite their testudo supposedly being next to invincible against projectiles

Volleys do have their place, but mostly as a way to open the battle, and at long range. You are correct that that can often be used to provide breathing room for troop movement. However, once the fighting starts, archers usually start picking individual targets and fire at will

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. There's no doubt that the English longbows were a force to themselves. They were lethal in piercing armour but they were still used in generally the same manner. To open up the battle by forcing the enemy to take a defensive stance and "thinning the herd" (so to speak) before your own infantry engages their forces.

Once the infantry engaged however, you didn't want to be raining down arrows on your own men and so the purpose of the archers largely changes to a completely different purpose; controlling the flow of battle with strategic use of volleys.

And yes...the Mongols changed everything with their horse archers. There's a reason a good part of the population is descended from Genghis Khan...

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 40 points 3 weeks ago

That's why I use a staff and just unleash a huge lightning strike to destroy my enemies

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's what a hammer is for, nerd.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I prefer a spear and magic helmet.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Always a classic as well.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago
[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 weeks ago

Quite right and why make your fastest, best archers wait for your slowest ones?

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, real warfare isn't a good spectator sport. It's chaotic, difficult to understand what's going on, things take way longer or way shorter to happen than would make sense for a film, and it's nothing like the orderly battles shown to us by Hollywood. The fog of war is a real thing. But that's why they do it, because if they did it realistically it wouldn't be very fun to watch.

[-] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Except if the movie is an anti-war one.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Yes indeed. Generation Kill is the only thing I've seen that got close to reality. I was in a unit that did exactly what was shown in that show, and for the most part they nailed it. They showed the confusion, stupid orders, lack of proper communication, the constant fatigue, and the crazy shit that just happens out of nowhere when you have a bunch of 18-20 year old testosterone rage machines running around with serious hardware.

[-] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

This makes me want a chaotic locked wide shot of a old battle for at least a minute, to take it in

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Actually, it worked pretty much exactly this way in the first stages of battle.

In the opening moves of a medieval battle, archers were essentially like the "creeping fire" that they used in World War 1; it's purpose is to keep the enemy immobile behind their shields and unable to advance as fast as they would like. Your army can't rush to take an advantageous position if they're constantly having to stop and hide under their shields.

In WW1, in the Somme especially, the artillery would lay down what they called "creeping fire" to keep the enemy huddled in their trenches while their own soldiers advance behind the wall of firepower. Archers basically played the same role.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 points 3 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
935 points (100.0% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2416 readers
84 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS