1798
Move the Overton Window (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by FundMECFSResearch to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, no! She didn't denounce Putin fast enough! I guess I have to vote for genocide, then...

Let me guess: you're one of those people who squawks about "purity tests", too, huh? And the irony is completely lost on you.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago
[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

The GOP has been using the Green Party to split the Left vote for years.

how could that be effective, if the green party didn't push leftist views?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'll relink the article on vote splitting.

It's amazing to me to talk to people who claim to be political and yet seem to have never actually considered how elections actually work.

https://electionscience.org/education/vote-splitting

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

this is just spam.

the answer is the green party does push leftist views.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I did a quick check. there's not one Green Party member of Congress as of 2024.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Green_politicians_who_have_held_office_in_the_United_States

I never said that the Party didn't have Leftist views; I said that they are taking Left votes from the Dems and helping the GOP win.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

no, they are earning votes the Democrats can't.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

And exactly what good are those votes doing if the Greens can't win any elections?

The point of running isn't to make nice speeches, it's to get elected and make real changes.

Again, what is the point if you never win?

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

the prohibition party never won, but they got a constitutional amendment.

the point is building a movement and demonstrating power.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Quick search shows that the Prohibition Party was established in 1868 and Prohibition was enacted in 1919. About 50 years later.

Greens were established in 2001. I guess that means you're willing to wait another 25 years for any substantive change.

Also, it's pretty funny that you can pay attention to the Prohibition Party and ignore the idea of vote splitting.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

the fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

You get funnier and funnier. I literally lol'd that one.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

if you don't know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

This from the guy who needed 'splitting the vote explained'

You just keep getting funnier and funnier.

btw, uproarious laughter isn't considered a sign of petulance. It means 'sulky'

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’

just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn't mean anyone needed to see it.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to.

You're a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas.

You are talented and well-respected in your community.

Need any more affirmations?

After all the laughter you've given me, I feel like giving something back.

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

there's not one Green Party member of Congress as of 2024.

this has nothing to do with what I said

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Again, what is the point if you never win?

Please answer the question.

I'm pretty sure you can't, but in case someone else stumbles on this I want it shown that you couldn't

[-] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

don't be petulant

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Why do you keep bringing up Putin? I'm not voting for Putin. I don't care what the GOP thinks about the Green Party, either. Why do you find these arguments compelling?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, no! She didn’t denounce Putin fast enough!

Literally the first thing you mentioned was Putin. And then you get on me for explaining myself.

And if you don't care what the GOP thinks of the Greens means that you have absolutely no idea how elections actually work in the US. I'll give you a link on 'splitting the vote' so you can understand.

https://electionscience.org/education/vote-splitting

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1798 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7454 readers
2507 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS