236
submitted 1 week ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 149 points 1 week ago

Take your console exclusive bullshit and shove it up your ass. I'll play it when it's on PC. And only on PC.

[-] technomad@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 week ago

I'll go a step further and say only when it's been vetted and discounted on PC.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

This will probably be the last time it ever happens. They're trying to get people to double dip, and plenty will, but the console install base isn't what it was when GTA V came out at the end of a generation. Plus we all know full well that the PC version will happen, whereas in yesteryear, we weren't sure.

[-] Kelly@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the console install base isn't what it was when GTA V came out at the end of a generation.

I had a look to check the figures.

From the PlayStation perspective February 2025 estimates put the PS5 at 74.9m, while January 2013 estimates put the PS3 at 77m.

However Xbox is really letting their numbers lag with 28.3m Series consoles sold by September 2024 vs 77.2m 360 consoles by April 2013.

If we were just talking PlayStation I would say 97% is near enough to make no difference but if we compare both platforms together its only 67% and that is enough to influence strategy. A console only release in 2025 is unlikely to eclipse GTA5's position as "fastest-selling entertainment product in history".

[-] SkyeStarfall 13 points 1 week ago

But also don't forget that the amount of gamers is larger today than in 2013. Gaming is much more mainstream, and so even 97% of the install base is still disappointing considering steam grew by, what, 3x or something in terms of average monthly users?

Another source I found is that the amount of total gamers grew by roughly 50% from 2013 to 2025. But yeah, I just did a quick skin numbers are not precise

But still, 97% is disappointing considering the general demographic was supposed to grow. And then, in reality, it's just 67% too

[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's a good point.

If gaming grew and the total userbase is the same now, then it's smaller by percentage.

That must been that PC is just exploding in popularity over the time period in question.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

A game like GTA is likely to drive console sales, but not enough to make up that deficit.

[-] biscuit@lemdro.id 14 points 1 week ago

I just don't have the patience to wait even more. I have a PS5, so why wouldn't I play it on release??

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Because I don't want to play full price for a 1080p upscaled experience at 30fps. If it's a good experience then it will be worth the wait and that much better when it runs smoother, looks better, and loads faster. Plus it will have most of the bugs worked by then.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago

Because I don't want console level performance when I play it for the first time

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Why would you want to pay $70 for a pay to win game at all?

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

There's a single player game people are pretty jazzed about, too.

[-] biscuit@lemdro.id 12 points 1 week ago

Huh? For £70 I'm getting -

  • Huge open world
  • Very fun and emergent gameplay
  • Likely a world with multiple competing systems and subsystems to play with
  • Incredibly detailed world to get lost and immersed in
  • Given the RDR2 writing, likely a really well written story

But you've decided to latch onto one aspect of the previous game (the Online mode) to try to be as contrarian as possible?

I sure as heck will pay £70 for the above. And so will many millions of others. Sorry if that does a poo on your hate-train.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Huh? For £70 I’m getting

Based on what? You don't actually know until it gets released. Sure, past history and reputation are certainly things to factor in, but we've seen plenty of major gaming companies shit the bed, despite their reputations.

Wait until it launches and the reviews come in.

[-] biscuit@lemdro.id 5 points 1 week ago

I'm responding to a comment assuming it'll be nothing but a "pay to win" game, despite any real evidence of that - I'm pointing out the expectations of GTA VI.

This sub is like Reddit on steroids. Just a bunch of contrarian kids trying to start arguments on the internet. Bizarre.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

I don't see any horse balls physics in your list.

Utterly unplayable.

[-] Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Dude thats crazy. I havent paod full price for a game in years, have a little patience and you can get a bunch more games for that much.

Isthereanydeal.com

Games are always on sale.

[-] biscuit@lemdro.id 3 points 1 week ago

Good for you! For GTA VI, I definitely wanna play it as quickly as possible and £70 is a pretty reasonable price for that.

[-] Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm with you on not paying full price in general, but they answered your main question before and you didnt acknowledge it.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

You hope you'll get those things. It's Rockstar though so who really knows. I mean we do know we're going to get a single player that's been confirmed by Rockstar but everything else is just a guess. The map leak people seem to suggest that the map will include NASA and Disneyland which will be cool I guess, but we don't know that that's just a prediction and I don't quite understand how they can predict that.

I just don't trust Rockstar not to screw it up with GTA online 2, now with more irritating flying bikes

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Or $100 ,as some people are predicting

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

And only on PC

That's going to be a long wait my friend.

[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I'd rather wait than buy a console for a single game that will barely hit 720p/30.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think they mean it will never be PC only, so it'd be an infinite wait. Or maybe some future release version will be console only.

Also, "720p/30" lol

[-] tordenflesk@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It's been the same for... ~25 years, since at least GTA3.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You can still play them on both console and PC and not only PC.

[-] AarynBlack@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I got nothing but time

[-] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

K. You do that.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
236 points (100.0% liked)

Games

37192 readers
890 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS