953
submitted 1 year ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] boke@sh.itjust.works 243 points 1 year ago

This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

[-] Evkob@lemmy.ca 95 points 1 year ago

You're right, thanks for adding context. I'm immediately suspicious when a picture is posted with no accompanying news article, and my search wasn't turning up any articles, only social media links.

Here's a French article about it.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago

Regardless, it's presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

Though I'd be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 44 points 1 year ago

Australia watching on with regret.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago
[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

We knew that BEFORE the election and yet elected the LNP anyway, fuck voters.

[-] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Could be worse, you could be a murican ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

right?! gawwwwwwd we’re so fucking captured

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

They don't need attack subs. They need boomer subs. At this point, Canada needs a nuclear deterrent. And I say that as an American who would be in the cross hairs of said nuclear deterrent. Canada should contract with the French for protection under their umbrella until they can build some of their own. The lesson of Ukraine should be that nukes protect small nations from fascist larger ones. Canada could easily end up like Ukraine. It's not like fascists can't find a casus belli. Putin was "restoring Russian glory" or some such. Trump would be "finishing the American Revolution" or some other bullshit.

Please, Canada, from a friend of yours to the south, do not take this threat lightly. No one is going to be able to save you if the US decides to invade. The same oceans that protect you will prevent your rescue. The only hope Canada will ever have of being able to militarily protect its borders from the US is a credible nuclear deterrent.

Just please, don't harden your hearts while you build these weapons of destruction. Don't close your doors to refugees from the US. As someone who is on the regime's enemies list, hopping across the Canadian border and begging for asylum is the last chance I might have if things really go bad.

[-] yannic@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

IIRC only 2 out of the 9 french subs in service exclusively carry torpedoes and anti-ship missiles (Rubis class). I'm sure the 3 Suffren class with no second strike capabilities could still deliver some sort of short ranged tac nuke. So there are high chances that this is a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

[-] thecoffeehobbit@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

France hasn't had tactical nukes for some time now

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Lamp Oil, Rope, Nuclear Subs? You want it? It's yours, my friend. As looong as you have enough Euros.

[-] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

Khajit has wares, if you have coin.

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, they're not mutually exclusive. Nobody was about to start openly threatening the Americans, but having French forces around and mulling over defence deals with France sends a signal.

We don't know what Macron and Trudeau talked about, but accelerating things like this in light of the new reality could well have been part of it.

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Also a great and well deserved middle finger to Australia

[-] jimd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

What's the point of these submarines if there aren't nukes on them?

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

There's a dismantled trebuchet on board.

[-] Alloi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

to demonstrate (politely) how quickly and quietly they can appear when we need them to. without endangering anyone or raising alarms that allow trump and co to rattle their sabers

[-] jimd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

i like it, we should be like - "maybe we have nukes, maybe we dont. you wont know until its too late"

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

To shoot at the ones with nukes on them?

[-] prole 1 points 1 year ago

Nuclear submarines are powered-by nuclear power, they aren't necessarily platforms for nuclear weapons.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I guess they could use them as a regular strategic missile platform.

[-] 60d@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
953 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12074 readers
938 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS